(almost) NON-UPGRADED False God Rainbow

[pikachufan2164]

Seems like a terrible suggestion, since the skeleton would just mutate into a random creature...

This deck was made before Skeleton gained the Undead passive ability.

The deck is also super-outdated, and the thread should be left alone.

[russianspy1234]

That post was made LONG before the skeleton buff. Use timestamps please.

not everyone has been around long enough to know that the skeleton has not always had the ability.

[UserClone]

not everyone has been around long enough to know that the skeleton has not always had the ability.

This. Also, I was under the impression that it was okay to necro-post in a deck thread if you want to comment about that type of deck so that you aren't making multiple threads to address one type of deck. Either way, I apologize. I have only been around like a month, so my mistake, folks.

[ddevans96]

not everyone has been around long enough to know that the skeleton has not always had the ability.

Hence why you use timestamps.

[UserClone]

not everyone has been around long enough to know that the skeleton has not always had the ability.

Hence why you use timestamps.

Okay, not everyone knows that Skeleton EVER didn't have that ability. Like I said, I am new to the game and so I found the thing I quoted amusing. I ought to have known someone on the internet would get all butthurt over it. You were new to something too, once.

[willng3]

Chill, please.

Also, I was under the impression that it was okay to necro-post in a deck thread if you want to comment about that type of deck so that you aren't making multiple threads to address one type of deck. Either way, I apologize. I have only been around like a month, so my mistake, folks.

You just have to be very, very careful when necro-posting in topics to make sure that people don't jump down your throat if you make a mistake.  Of course, mistakes do happen, we are only human after all.

There is no rule forbidding posting constructive, coherent thoughts on threads of outdated decks; anyone who tells you differently is expressing an opinion and nothing more.

Follow the general guideline for necro-posting:  Don't revive old threads unless you have something constructive to add to it.  Check the timestamp of the first post; if something doesn't make sense (Skeletons not functioning right with Eternity, quanta cap forbidding Fire Bolts from dealing 200 damage, etc.) then that's a good sign that there's been a few changes to the way the game works since that point in time.  You can also check and see what changes are made during each patch here (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/board,49.0.html).  I would much rather see comments made about this deck here rather than starting a brand new thread for it every time.

[ddevans96]

That second line was directly to russianspy, who acted more like I hadn't said anything about timestamps in the first place. I was hoping to convey that there are ways to check the validity of a comment that may have once been true, learn on your own, and avoid this conversation.

I will clarify mine and pika's statements. This deck was made many, many months and patches ago, in a totally different environment. It used to be one of the most effective FG decks in the game. Back then, skeletons were solely a vanilla creature and were the cheapest to use for rewinding.

Since then, many things have changed. Skeleton's undead ability is a fairly new addition, and as such it cannot be immediately rewinded. However, the phrase afters suggesting you can use another cheap creature is still valid. These days you would rewind a firefly or weak mutant.

Now, if you accuse me of getting butthurt, I would like to tell you something about me.

I've become a very blunt person on these forums, because I believe bluntness encourages people to look up things for themselves instead of begging for answers. I'm not saying you were at all, sometimes I come across as rude, and I never intend to. It's just the way I am.

[vidurkhanna]

i dont have an eternity yet!

wat changes would be necessary for the deck to work as good as it does without eternity?

[ForgottenSoul21]

i dont have an eternity yet!

wat changes would be necessary for the deck to work as good as it does without eternity?

this fg deck is outdated. please dont build it unless you really want to.

[russianspy1234]

That second line was directly to russianspy, who acted more like I hadn't said anything about timestamps in the first place. I was hoping to convey that there are ways to check the validity of a comment that may have once been true, learn on your own, and avoid this conversation.

I will clarify mine and pika's statements. This deck was made many, many months and patches ago, in a totally different environment. It used to be one of the most effective FG decks in the game. Back then, skeletons were solely a vanilla creature and were the cheapest to use for rewinding.

Since then, many things have changed. Skeleton's undead ability is a fairly new addition, and as such it cannot be immediately rewinded. However, the phrase afters suggesting you can use another cheap creature is still valid. These days you would rewind a firefly or weak mutant.

Now, if you accuse me of getting butthurt, I would like to tell you something about me.

I've become a very blunt person on these forums, because I believe bluntness encourages people to look up things for themselves instead of begging for answers. I'm not saying you were at all, sometimes I come across as rude, and I never intend to. It's just the way I am.

my point is that, the timestamp will not give any additional information to someone who is not aware that at some point in the past, skeleton rewound like any other creature.

[UserClone]

Hey guys, just wanted to pop in to say sorry for the cranky post and thanks very much for the helpful info and link! Also, if anything, SG's new deck is still pretty amazing, and rewinding/Eternity-ing skeletons is, if anything, even better since that patch. Especially since you can always rewind the fireflies.

[ninetyfools]

Well, this deck still works with a few modifications.
AND its actually a fun deck.
Maybe Dim shields may be better than Sundials.