Guest Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by a guest. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Letter_K (13)

Pages: [1] 2
1
Forum Archive / Re: RARE CARD FARMS - updated daily by the community!
« on: June 16, 2010, 08:50:28 pm »
=x I click on farming request but for some reason there was an error. x.x is it just me? XD

I really need a discord right now tho XD ikr? weird :P

2
Crucible Archive / Re: Small Moon | Great Luna
« on: June 16, 2010, 03:20:21 am »
Talk about repetitive... Guys, one person saying "Oh, this card is too complex." is fine.. We don't need tons of people repeating the same thing as it now sounds like we're bashing on the maker.

Truthfully, I like this card. :) It shouldn't be too hard and it's creative. The artwork is fabulous~ Of course, I can see how this card could be used to micro-manage a deck to make its quantum outcome better but it could also be used as a simple 4-pillar-in-1 card.

One thing that I think is gonna be AWESOME with this card is a FG made out of this card. Probably called something simple like "Lunar" or something. :D And it'll master the synergies. That'll be hard to program but it'll be an awesome outcome.

:) So yeah... My 2 Cents is that I like this card ;D And with a table in a wiki, we'll all be happy and it's not too complex.

3
Rainbow Decks / Re: Malduk's PvP2 rainbow
« on: June 14, 2010, 04:57:50 am »
The optimum number of towers, based on extensive testing, is five.
I've found that 6 quantum towers and 6 supernovas is the optimal amount for a speed rainbow.
um...

Anyway, quite like the deck. I've faced a deck like this one in t50 a few times, and that black hole and discord quite often are the deciding factor. cheap healing and quantum denial can be really effective when rush decks are involved, and in this decks case, it looks as though it doesn't slow the deck down in the process.
lol yeah I saw that too and was like "well then... hmm.."

:) Gotta say Malduk, this is a REALLY solid deck. :) I really like how you used all elements in perfect harmony (wow this sounds really cliche). :D This seems also like a really fun deck to play with as well.

:D nice job!

4
Rainbow Decks / Re: I like to kill things.
« on: June 09, 2010, 03:31:46 am »
If I ever need an assasinator, I'll hire you. :)

With 9 different types of killing methods.... it's just amazing XD

:) One thing that I'm not too positive you'll have enough quanta on is the pandemoniums.

If you unupgrade it, it'll be perfectly fine. Although, if you do plan to upgrade the pandemoniums so your werewolves are unharmed, that'll be +3 extra quanta which will take forever to make just through marks and a few quantan pillars.

Other than that, this looks like a perfect deck to make someone go, "RAGE QUIT" XD

5
Crucible Archive / Re: Pigley | Pigley
« on: May 25, 2010, 08:42:34 pm »
OMGOMGOMG XD I LOVE IT XD This means...

1st Pigley costs 5 quanta to move to opponent's hand.
Opponent uses 10 quanta to give it back.
you use TWENTY quanta (since it doubles) to give it back to opponent.
He has to us FORTY,
then the rest are...

80,
160,
320,
640 OMFG :D

6
Rainbow Decks / Re: Yaladilae's Butterfly Angel (v1.21)
« on: May 22, 2010, 12:36:51 am »
=] I just wanted to say thanks for the idea about the butterfly angel! XD I'm using butterfly pest, which isn't nearly as cool of a name but less quanta atleast. ^^"

:) I'm glad that you still respond to this thread as it is very amazing esp how you updated it :) ty!!

7
The deck is far from perfect but I have now defeated every false god with it. Has your speed poison deck done that? Since the sundial nerf, I would consider any unupgraded false god deck with over a 30 percent win rate to be acceptable. I never said anywhere that the deck was perfect, but it does work.
Ummm....... Divine Glory? I believe Fire Queen is also impossible with this.
Sorry, what was I thinking? I beat every false god except fire queen divine glory and octane.
I ask the same, "What are you thinking?"

Never plainly say, "Hey dude, you might just suck with my deck," who actually gives the time to test out your deck. In all honesty, I'm not sure how this deck can be better than the other Nymphomania deck with Nymph's Tears.

Both don't use cards that originally are rare but I'm almost positive that the other deck has a higher win % as it has an unlimited amount of antimatter.

8
Duo-Decks / Re: Terro's Pesty FG Deck!
« on: May 15, 2010, 10:39:35 pm »
=D this is such an amazing deck for pvp as well!

I did tweak it a bit, well.. not a bit but.. xD
I first changed the mark to Darkness (Oh, big change) and put another vampire, and -3 towers to have 5 darkness towers and 6 aethers.

I found out that 6 aether towers + Aether mark is just overkill and even with the auto-mulligan, the chances of not being able to rush denial someone is still high. In my way, you have a bit more choices of darkness cards with the extra mark.

:) Either way, an amazing deck. :D
--
EDIT: Nvm, I'm a noob. :P After playing some FGs and losing, I changed back to the original because my towers were wack. :D The original with aether mark is AMAZING> :D Dont trust me above. :P

9
Darkness / Re: My Thief Deck
« on: April 14, 2010, 04:13:46 am »
-Chews on a snack bar slowly-
-Reads the stats-
-Reads 15/20 FG-
-Stops chewing, frozen, and has snack bar falling out of my mouth-
:O

10
Hmm, just wondering but would taking out Quintessence and putting in Anubis be a nicer addition?
No, because Anubis costs 8 :time, which is already in heavy use because of sundials, hourglasses, and eternity. Plus, you don't need to quint much, mainly just your EQ, otyugh, and fallen druid
=) Oh okay! Thanks Bigbadbanana! I was just wondering. True, only need to quint EQ, oty, and fallen druid.

Also, would it be alright to just not have fallen druid in if it's not upped?

11
Hmm, just wondering but would taking out Quintessence and putting in Anubis be a nicer addition?

12
Game Suggestions and Feedback / Re: April Fools' Day Oracle
« on: March 22, 2010, 12:51:33 am »
I so ROFL'd at the idea of malignant cells for pets which then led to an idea of having a creature for a pet that if you win with it, you get a small bonus of coins / points. :3

I dont know. xD but that'd be hilarious having a malignant cell!

"Yay! I have a pet! Oh hey, two pets now! .. Er, four pets! Heh.... O... Oh god.. Eight.. N-No please no more! Sixteen! N-NO!!!!!! THIRTY--- *dies*"


Pages: [1] 2
anything
blarg: