Guest posts by thraexis11

1

Aether / Re: We had a good run team.

« on: December 26, 2010, 08:02:49 am »

Thank you all for being great team till the end, it has been a great war , very interesting with lots of turn overs and unexpected results.
It has been an honor and privilege to be a part of this team, and I really enjoyed playing with all of you. Thank you ICB for giving me a chance to be a part in this and thank you all for being such a good team mates, and for puting so much time and effort in building and testing all those decks.
We had ups and downs but at the end I am very happy with the way we all performed and with the final standing of our team.
I want to thank all other teams for playing fair and with lots of creativity,  some of them wasn't very lucky in last few rounds, but I guess that is why this war was so interesting. I wish them better luck next year.
And I want to thank SG and all other warmasters to make this happened, you all are the reason that Elements has one of the best comunities I have seen in any online game.

Merry xms everyone and I hope I will see you in next war.

2

Aether / Re: Round 9 Deck

« on: December 20, 2010, 09:37:03 pm »

You know what, this round already has the potential to be the last round in War. We mind as well go all out.
ICB already mentioned he has internet, so we should just try to make this the best deck possible.



EDIT: Unexpected decks are unexpected.

Code: [Select]

52g 52g 542 542 542 5f6 5f6 5ro 5ro 61r 61r 61r 61t 63a 63a 63a 63a 63a 63a 63a 63a 63a 63a 63a 71b 71d 71d 71d 71d 7n2

So, how are you planning to use deflags without fire quanta source?

3

Aether / Re: Round 9 Deck

« on: December 18, 2010, 12:06:34 pm »

Hi, sry I haven't been much active lately- I had some RL issues and I actually needed some break from elements .
First of all, I have to say great job everyone for creating those great decks for last 2 rounds, and grats ICB for winning that match and keeping us alive . It is so funny to see death team out of war, since  they were 2nd  just 2 rounds ago , - it just shows how unpredictable and fun this war really is.

I think Evaria's suggestion is great, since there are no rules in war .I think it will give us much more chance to survive couple more rounds then we would with 65 cards. We have great tactical advantage with 59 cards and we should abuse that, everyone else would do the same if they were us. Of course we first need to win actually, in order to do that .

Oh yes, and I would salvage death pendulums and bone walls - but it depends also on ICB's opponent.

4

12 Lives - Battle Results / Re: Round 7 catalyzeme 3-0 thraexis11

« on: December 16, 2010, 02:01:20 pm »

Sry ; I had no time to post this earlier. Well played catalyzeme, good luck for the rest of this event; it looks like I am out.

Code: [Select]

61o 61o 61o 61o 61o 61o 61o 61q 61q 61q 61q 61q 61q 61r 61r 61r 61r 622 622 63a 63a 63a 63a 63a 80g 80g 80g 80g 80g 80g

Code: [Select]

4vj 4vj 4vj 4vj 4vj 5c5 5c5 5c5 5c5 5c7 5c7 5c7 5c7 5oi 5oi 5oi 5oi 621 621 621 621 63a 63a 63a 74a 74a 74a 74a 81q 81q

Code: [Select]

5f6 5f6 5f9 5f9 5f9 5f9 5f9 61o 61o 61o 61o 61o 61o 61o 61t 61t 61t 622 622 622 63a 63a 63a 63a 7ds 7ds 7ds 7ds 7ds 7ds

5

12 Lives - Battle Results / Re: nilsje 3 - 1 thraexis11

« on: December 09, 2010, 07:50:57 pm »

Code: [Select]

5l8 5l8 5l8 5l8 5l8 5l8 5l8 5lh 5lh 5lh 5lh 5lh 5li 5li 5li 5li 5li 5li 5mq 5mq 5mq 5mq 5mq 5mq 7k1 7n2 7n2 7n2 7n2 7n2

Code: [Select]

5um 5um 5um 5um 5um 61o 61o 61o 61o 61o 61o 61o 622 622 622 622 622 622 63a 63a 63a 63a 63a 7t6 7ta 7ta 7tb 7td 7tf 808

Code: [Select]

4vc 4vc 4vc 4vc 4vc 4vc 4vd 4vd 4vd 4vd 4ve 4ve 4ve 4vi 4vi 4vl 4vl 4vl 50u 50u 50u 50u 50u 50u 6u2 6u2 6u7 6u7 6u7 6u7In game 2 I forgot to change my mark and wanted to cancel game search but it was to late bcs nilsie already entered the game, so I decided to give him a win because it was my mistake after all. I haven't actually use any deck in game 2 so that's why only 3 decks are here.
Game 1, I won bcs of Miracle, Game 3 he outrushed me, game 4 - early discord + gravity nymph decided the match .

I lost 

I still have : 

6

12 Lives - Battle Results / Re: 5th Round ~ Napalm vs Indrejue ~ 2-0

« on: December 04, 2010, 05:08:30 pm »

2-0 is still a sweep
even 1-0 is still a sweep so yes

only forfeit by MIA/AFK/inactivity (or 'bye') wont get you any +1

I don't think that is correct. I will qoute Essence : ˝Gaining and Losing Lives
Players who sweep another (win a match 3-0) gain one life.  Players who LOSE to another player by 0-3 lose TWO EXTRA lives of their choice.˝
So there shouldn't be extra life for 2-0 , unless RR changed the rules.

7

Metamorphosis / Re: RULES

« on: December 04, 2010, 01:16:05 pm »

So if you metamorph your deck to something completly different in round 1, can you slowly start changing it back to the deck you started , in later rounds ?
So basicly you can only use 2 decks changing them slowly each round if I understand it correctly  ?
Oh, and please explain this rule a bit : Build a deck of any size (from 30 to 60 cards) using exactly 6 different cards.

I don't understand how can you build deck larger then 36 cards with that rule , unless pillars aren't considered  to be those 6 different cards ?

8

12 Lives - Battle Results / thraexis11- RavingRabbid 3-2

« on: December 01, 2010, 08:12:23 pm »

Close games, especially last one.

G1 1-0
He had some CC enthropy deck I am guessing but he couldn't do anything against morning starts.

Code: [Select]

5l8 5l8 5l8 5l8 5l8 5l8 5l8 5lh 5lh 5lh 5lh 5lh 5li 5li 5li 5li 5li 5li 5mq 5mq 5mq 5mq 5mq 5mq 7k1 7n2 7n2 7n2 7n2 7n2

G2  1-1
He got a nice counter with his owl eyes and druidic staffs, easy win for him

Code: [Select]

55k 55k 55k 55k 55k 55k 55q 55q 55q 55r 55r 55r 55v 55v 55v 55v 55v 55v 576 576 576 576 576 576 745 745 745 745 745 745
G3 2-1
I lost three time against these darkness deck in previous rounds , so I know how much annoying it is. Pests countered cryssaoras and 3 dragons made a quick win.

Code: [Select]

5uk 5uk 5uk 5uk 5uk 5uk 5uk 5uk 5ul 5ul 5ul 5ul 5ul 5ul 5uo 5uo 5uo 606 606 606 606 606 606 606 7t6 7t6 7t6 7t6 7t6 7t6
G4  2-2
2 rush decks, he won a toss and he had a perfect starting hand. GG !

Code: [Select]

58o 58o 58o 58o 58o 58o 58o 58o 58o 58o 58o 58o 58o 58o 58q 58q 58q 58q 58q 593 593 593 593 593 77g 77g 77g 77g 77g 77g
G5  3-2
2 fast decks again, I managed to win with 2 Hps left- super close game.
his fog shield have failed this game, didn't block much- otherwise I am sure it would have been 3-2 for him

Code: [Select]

5bs 5bs 5bs 5bs 5bs 5bt 5c0 5c0 5c0 5c3 5c4 5c7 5c7 5c7 5c7 5c8 5c8 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 5de 7ad 7ae 7ae 7ae 7al 7am
Ok so I don't have

I still have :   and don't have 1ups any more.

9

Aether / Re: Round 6 decks

« on: November 30, 2010, 11:47:00 am »

Well I am out, but I'll be here if you need to test some decks or something like that- since I'll have more time now.
Anyway I wish you all GL, and at least 5 wins this round  .

10

Round 5 / Re: (air) Dogg 2 - 1 thraexis11 (aether)

« on: November 27, 2010, 08:36:22 pm »

Code: [Select]

61o 61o 61o 61o 61o 61o 61o 61s 61t 61t 61t 61t 61t 61u 61u 61u 61v 61v 61v 620 620 621 621 621 63a 63a 63a 63a 63a 63a
Yep, very close games- last game dogg was on 2HP, I put down my shield and he topdecked deflag and managed to kill me.
In both games I have lost, fog shield also was one of the major factors , nerf it please .
Anyway, he got counters for my DS's and I had no real dmg.
One more tnx for Boingo for managing to make all decks for this round despite some Vault problems.
GG dogg, I played the best I could but I had no chance against those deflags and with this slow deck.

11

Aether / Re: Round 5 results

« on: November 27, 2010, 08:23:33 pm »

Damn I lost 2-1 , closest game ever.
He was on 2 HP, I put down a DS and he just topdecked deflag and managed to kill me.

Blah so unlucky, anyway thnx Boingo for managing to get all decks ready.

12

Tournament Archive / Re: Western Tournament - 27 November 2010 - Pandora's Toolbox - upgraded

« on: November 27, 2010, 06:37:48 pm »

thraexis11- Balthazar666 2-0