Yeah you know cause like if you flip a coin and it comes up heads 10x in a row the outcome is no longer 50/50.. it just has to have a higher probability to come up tails next right?
lawl gamblers fallacy.
No, it's entirely a different thing. Let's say person A bets Troh gets a nymph on day 1, person B bets Troh gets a nymph on day 30.
For simplicity, let's assume the probability of winning a nymph from a single oracle spin is 5%.
Probability of person A winning is
0.05 = 5%
(either Troh spins it on the first day, or not).
Probability of person B winning is
0.05 * (0,95)^29 ~= 1,13 %
(That's because person B wins if and only if Troh did not win a nymph for 29 days and won it on the 30th day)
That's quite a big difference. If the question was "Will Troh win a nymph on day X" then both would have an equal chance (assuming Troh spins oracle on those days). The question is "When will he get his first nymph" though and it changes quite a lot. Let's just say the probability of Troh winning his first nymph after 1000000 spins is a bit lower then probability of Troh winning it on day 4
(though it's a small difference... in absolute values )