Ask a simple question, get a simple answer

[Xenocidius]

I think marks count a little more than a pillar for the reason they are already in play.
When Quanta Index calculations were made, the pillar was counted for 5 (quanta) because that was the average number of uses a pillar get (counting turn of draw, turns of permanence on the field, length of game, etc...).
A mark is worth the same number of turns the game is expected to last.
So if you expect to finish the game in 5 turn, you would use the mark 5 times so in this case it would be equal to a pillar.
An average game is 10 turns, when using a stall deck it can be 20+ turns.
So i think the QI should be calculated accordingly.

The same applies to normal pillars, though. The longer you expect a game to last, the less each pillar will produce on average, and the higher your QI can be. That's the thing about QI - it is fixed for every single deck, not variable depending on speed. However, lower QIs are preferred for faster decks, and higher QIs for slower decks. In other words, marks and pillars should be counted as having constant quanta production. Overall, I've found that counting the mark as two pillars works best.

[UnderneathTheLens]

I think marks count a little more than a pillar for the reason they are already in play.
When Quanta Index calculations were made, the pillar was counted for 5 (quanta) because that was the average number of uses a pillar get (counting turn of draw, turns of permanence on the field, length of game, etc...).
A mark is worth the same number of turns the game is expected to last.
So if you expect to finish the game in 5 turn, you would use the mark 5 times so in this case it would be equal to a pillar.
An average game is 10 turns, when using a stall deck it can be 20+ turns.
So i think the QI should be calculated accordingly.

The same applies to normal pillars, though. The longer you expect a game to last, the less each pillar will produce on average, and the higher your QI can be. That's the thing about QI - it is fixed for every single deck, not variable depending on speed. However, lower QIs are preferred for faster decks, and higher QIs for slower decks. In other words, marks and pillars should be counted as having constant quanta production. Overall, I've found that counting the mark as two pillars works best.

The QI calculator does count the mark as 1 pillar, but you make a very good point.

[furballdn]

Is there a cap for maximum number of bone wall charges?
What's the hp cap again? 500? 499?

[Absol]

Is there a cap for maximum number of bone wall charges?
What's the hp cap again? 500? 499?

Player's HP, 500. Critter's HP (and ATK), 499.
Bone Wall charges, i don't know.

[dragonsdemesne]

Is there a cap for maximum number of bone wall charges?
What's the hp cap again? 500? 499?

I've seen bone wall go over 100; I've never seen a cap yet.

[Absol]

Is there a cap for maximum number of bone wall charges?
What's the hp cap again? 500? 499?

I've seen bone wall go over 100; I've never seen a cap yet.

I've seen over 200, and still no sign of stopping.
If there's any cap, it should be at either 499, 500, or 999.

[mesaprotector]

Is there a cap for maximum number of bone wall charges?
What's the hp cap again? 500? 499?

I've seen bone wall go over 100; I've never seen a cap yet.

I've seen over 200, and still no sign of stopping.
If there's any cap, it should be at either 499, 500, or 999.

Well, it's not at 499/500.

Might try for 1000 if I have more time this afternoon.

[Higurashi]

Next bet: 9999

[NaTuraL]

That bonewall thing above is unbelievable lol.

I'm new here, so don't blast me but...Is there a cap to the amount of cards you can store? Just wandering as I'm running out of space underneath my deck, I'm guessing there will be a scroll bar or something like that when it get full but I thought I'd ask just in case

[Higurashi]

4000. It used to be 3k. There's no scroll bar, so the ALL button becomes useless.

[NaTuraL]

4000. It used to be 3k. There's no scroll bar, so the ALL button becomes useless.

Cheers Hig

[Absol]

@Bone Wall:
So i guess there is no hard limit, or most likely 9999. Which happens to be over 9000.

And this is over just because the FG decks out.

This is the FG deck:

by Absol

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 7k6 8pq

And this is the deck i use to test this:

by Absol

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

6ts 6ts 6ts 6ts 6ts 6ts 6ua 6ua 6ua 6ua 6ua 6ua 717 717 717 717 717 717 71b 71b 71b 7h1 7h1 7h1 7q0 7q0 7q0 7q4 7q5 7q8 8pp

Tried on trainer with maximum quanta from the start.