Oracle : Seism

[oblivion1212]

had fun with the pillarless trio 

[Holokausti]

Pillarless upped trio worked perfectly. For some odd reason Seism used Rewind on non-mitosised RoL's much more than one's with Mitosis. Guess it has something to do with Hope shield. Won Quicksand too \o/

[pulli23]

Hmm I lost quite heavily with the first OP's deck...


Got a decent hand, and could use all my shields from card number 18.. However he just outstalled my damage with 3 times stone skin: making me go deckout and he had 80 health left.


And that was with near perfect dimensional shield drawing....

[ddevans96]

The unupped EA/fractal his creatures deck is very poor. Immortal creatures are much better against him, because rewinds cause your chain to break easily.

[pulli23]

The unupped EA/fractal his creatures deck is very poor. Immortal creatures are much better against him, because rewinds cause your chain to break easily.

I'm using the mono aether variant... But as I said: just too little dmg in there, 2nd time I lost to being outstalled & deckout today.

[furballdn]

Aether with SoW for damage is viable. Personally, I just use the pilarless MitoRoL hope, though seism likes to troll with RT.

[eaglgenes101]

Fractals to get around SS.

[Higurashi]

The unupped EA/fractal his creatures deck is very poor. Immortal creatures are much better against him, because rewinds cause your chain to break easily.

The idea is that you don't Fractal until you have enough Dims to survive or have pulled them all, which means counting how much he can Rewind. But yes, it doesn't win a lot because Seism wins in 5 turns a lot. That means you -have- to pull all your Dims in a timely fashion, and that's somewhat rare. Unfortunately MA with EA's suffer from the same problem. The Fractal concept just lowered the risk of losing due to not enough offence, that's all.

majo's Phase Dragon+Fractal variant seems to lack , which is a huge problem since it slows down offence and can screw you out of playing even the first Dim. The concept is sound though.

[Rutarete]

Used this version of the pillarless one I made:

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

5bv 5bv 5bv 5bv 5c2 5c6 5c6 5c6 5c9 5c9 5c9 5lk 5lk 5lk 5lk 7ad 7ad 7af 7ai 7ai 7am 7ap 7ap 7ap 7jp 7jp 7jp 7jp 7jp 7jp 8pn

I have no upped sundials.

All I needed was one Rustler, and I got one on turn 3. Easy game. EM.

Used it a second time. Deck tried to scare me by not drawing hope until the last turn before I would have died, but I still won with EM. No cards from spin though

Third time, no rustlers and no mitosis. Just bonds and a few RoLs + Hope. You can imagine, I lost this time.

[ddevans96]

Used something like what Ruta posted, but with four upped sundials. He beat me in six turns even through a sundial. Think the draws were just lopsided, though, so I'll try again next time.

[summerz88]

The RoL Hope Mitosis deck is rubbish, its far too easily shut down by 1-2 rewinds

[ddevans96]

Used the same third-upped, four-dial version as last time, and I should probably post it:

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

5bt 5bt 5bv 5bv 5bv 5c6 5c6 5c6 5c6 5c9 5c9 5c9 5c9 5c9 5c9 5lk 5lk 5lk 5lk 7af 7jp 7jp 7jp 7jp 7jp 7jp 7q9 7q9 7q9 7q9 8pn

I won this time, with EM and three cards, but I feel I was lucky with rewinds, only seeing a couple throughout the whole game. That being said, I also didn't see a hope in the first half of the deck, so considering it still managed to win with EM, it might be more reliable than I think. Will keep using it :3

EDIT: Fixed grammar failures.