Why do i think this had something to do with Kael and his headache series :p jkAnd on-topic again I don't see why anyone would use pillars if this card were implemented. Wait, is there a 6x rule on these?Edit: did not see alternatively
Quote from: $$$man on August 08, 2010, 04:26:42 amWhy do i think this had something to do with Kael and his headache series :p jkAnd on-topic again I don't see why anyone would use pillars if this card were implemented. Wait, is there a 6x rule on these?Edit: did not see alternatively I'd like to claim the credit, but Jmizzle7 and Plastique have had ideas that could relate to this also.PS. this is awesome.
gives dual decks a lot more consistent quantum generation. very useful card.the wording on the card is weird "1 mark's matching quantum", so that means when you play one of those rare mark cards (that i don't have) then the pendulum may also generate quantum from that mark?
Quote from: SickPillow on August 08, 2010, 04:59:39 amgives dual decks a lot more consistent quantum generation. very useful card.the wording on the card is weird "1 mark's matching quantum", so that means when you play one of those rare mark cards (that i don't have) then the pendulum may also generate quantum from that mark?Similar to Gavel, this will most likely not benefit from extra marks.
i was more thinking it would then maybe randomly chose between the two marks. But otherwise i think the text should just say "your mark's matching quantum".