Weekly Featured Cards poll - Light

[twinsbuster]

addition info:

Will creatures change into cells when die in some situation?
Phoenix? Sacrifice Virus? Immolation?
What will happen if adrenaline played on the cells?
Do the new cells attack when come into play?

[Kuroaitou]

I highly suggest that you do NOT use this deck of mine, because it was purely intended as a fun deck, not a competitive or even effective one. I'd swap this for the Skittles deck.

Ah, okay then. I had to look through the topic initially because I didn't see Aflatoxin being used in the deck (Dragoon1140's modification uses it), so I'll edit that in.

addition info:

Will creatures change into cells when die in some situation?
Phoenix? Sacrifice Virus? Immolation?
What will happen if adrenaline played on the cells?
Do the new cells attack when come into play?

Green: Viruses do not become Malignant Cells when they kill themselves, UNLIKE the Immolation effect; Phoenixes do not also. I might have to add that in somewhere, probably around the 3rd paragraph/mini-statements.

Yellow: It says in the 2nd paragraph, "...(with Adrenaline, they spawn up to 4 new Malignant Cells after a turn ends)."

Red: Yes, they do. (Tested just now). ^^;


UPDATE: Article updated to reflect the questions above.

I've already uploaded the Aflatoxin article onto the Wiki, so once the Featured Card changes, then we'll be able to move onto Gravity.

[Korugar]

I don't know if you want to mention this, but Malignant cells also have a great synergy with Empathic Bond, especially if you have a creature on your own side that has become useless(if it's been antimattered or something).

[Hyroen]

Added to Korugar's card comment, it also works well with Adrenaline, producing more than 1 Malignant cell for each Adrenaline'd Malignant Cell with Infest.

[Memorystick]

Malignant cells are also fodder for improved mutation, devour, and butterfly effect Just have to make sure your druid(s) is(are) on the board (and possibly immortal) before the cells take over your entire board. Also, any mutant from a malignant cell spawns a malignant cell upon death.

[Nume]

Yeah I think it is worth mentioning the usage of aflatoxin on your own side as a mass creature generator. Also, a very prominent deck that uses aflatoxin and should be mentioned imo is pretty much every modification of the CC Why Bother deck. It works great for that deck due to all of its shields being damage reducing shields.

[Kuroaitou]

I don't know if you want to mention this, but Malignant cells also have a great synergy with Empathic Bond, especially if you have a creature on your own side that has become useless(if it's been antimattered or something).

Added to Korugar's card comment, it also works well with Adrenaline, producing more than 1 Malignant cell for each Adrenaline'd Malignant Cell with Infest.

Notes taken down - but I think that there are already plenty of cards that go well with Adrenaline (look in previous articles for details ^^; ), but I'll probably exchange the Boneyard | Graveyard with Empathic Bond and see how that goes.

Malignant cells are also fodder for improved mutation, devour, and butterfly effect Just have to make sure your druid(s) is(are) on the board (and possibly immortal) before the cells take over your entire board. Also, any mutant from a malignant cell spawns a malignant cell upon death.

All of those parts would make the article significantly longer than all of the cards done so far. O_o I'll see if I can add the part about Mutation though - being fodder for devour or targets for butterfly effect is a given nonetheless.

Yeah I think it is worth mentioning the usage of aflatoxin on your own side as a mass creature generator. Also, a very prominent deck that uses aflatoxin and should be mentioned imo is pretty much every modification of the CC Why Bother deck-[snip]

I've been thinking about this for a while, and I personally tried -not- to use CC Why Bother as a deck that incorporates Aflatoxin, considering that CC Why Bother is already connected to a lot of the popular cards; I'm trying to find more unique decks that use some of these not-so-generic/fairly situational cards, and if someone knows an amazing deck with both Flooding and Aflatoxin in it, I'd edit the article immediately to incorporate that deck because of the synergy it provides.

(Also - why call it 'CC: Why Bother?' if you're using Aflatoxin as a form of CC? O_o)

[Memorystick]

I don't know of any off the top of my head, but I could probably make one including chrysora, afla, flooding, permafrost shield, freeze, some ice bolts, poison, and an arscenic or two. (can't say it'd be reliable though)

...
(Also - why call it 'CC: Why Bother?' if you're using Aflatoxin as a form of CC? O_o)

This^ is an excellent question. One possible explanation might be that it doesn't use conventional CC cards/abilities (plague, infection, devour, chaos seed, firebolt, rain of fire, etc.). After all, what do you normally think of when you think CC? 

[miniwally]

Probably because they had the choice of no CC and a better chance vs gods I know which I'd go for.

[Nume]

The original version didnt have aflatoxin, and it is what the name was made from (though some would argue anti matter is cc but it doesnt actually remove any creatures so yeah). The reason I still referred to it as CCYB is because its still just a variation of that deck, even if it doesnt hold true to the title of not using cc.

[Bloodshadow]

Poll updated. I can't believe I forgot to do this.

[DrunkDestroyer]

Please, please, please don't let Black Hole win...it's so, epically, boring!
It's pretty much an anti rainbow, which comes close to be as boring as rainbows these days (not enough creativity anywhere). I mean, use it with discords and whatever and it's useful otherwise, but still..uggh.

Instead, vote Armagio. It's a much more interesting card. It synergises well with other cards, and underused compared to it's ability, and usefulness. It's only situational if you use it that way.