Yeah, considering the cost, 3 or 4 turns would be nice?
I think that is a really "Cool" idea!
Seriously:I think considering the price, it should freeze for 3 turns...
too strong, remember you can have 6 of these in a deck, this would greatly overshadow ice shield since ice shield is based on chance, not guaranteed, also, freeze becomes useless since this is basically the same effect but slightly more conditional with exception of
and
creatures.
I could say make it cheaper and leave it at 2 turns, but in comparison:
Congeal = 1
for 4 turns frozen, singular target, any creature element.
AZ = 7
for 2 turns frozen, multiple target, non
and non
creatures only.
scenario comparison:
Congeal: 5 enemy creatures = 5
for 5 spells cast, each creature for 4 turns.
1 congeal spell left.
AZ: 5 enemy creatures if non
& non
, 7
for 1 spell cast, all creatures for 2 turns.
5 AZ spells left.
In conclusion, This card greatly Overshadows Congeal, However, I believe it is slightly be justified with non
& non
regulation.
however, it needs a bit more justification, so I actually believe it is potentially too cheap, however, it is also justifiable due to having half turn potential (only 2 turns)
So increasing this to 3 turns would mean it needs to be more expensive, since it is better than Congeal in the sense of efficient multiple congealing.
I dont believe this needs to be improved turn wise, otherwise too OP, Leaving it at 2 turns is what i recommend.
