Instosis [FG][OTK][Arena]

[Pyrodinium]

Good job on updating the Instosis guide.

By the way, Destiny has a VERY slight chance of spawning an Armagio from her Fate Egg so the Chimera might come handy.

[mikpj]

So I was enjoying a semi upped gold league killer deck and now I have decided to switch to this deck.  Lets see what happens.

[eaglgenes101]

So I was enjoying a semi upped gold league killer deck and now I have decided to switch to this deck.  Lets see what happens.

You'll likely be run over by SoF. Use it on plat.

[whatifidogetcaught?]

I only have one Shard of Readiness. and I'm level 50. ugh...I want this deck so bad. I admit that this is the deck everyone should try to get for FG farming and plat.

[mikpj]

So I was enjoying a semi upped gold league killer deck and now I have decided to switch to this deck.  Lets see what happens.

You'll likely be run over by SoF. Use it on plat.

I want another fun deck without being a OTK deck

[choongmyoung]

just saying: i used seraph when i had only 3 SoRs.
you'll need chimera against any DR shields, but anyway it works.

[ddevans96]

PU works better than Seraph.

[Ephesar]

Hi everybody!

I have a quick question:

how does the new rule for supernovas influence the instosis deck? Is it a problem that you can only play one supernova per turn safely or doesn't it make any big difference?

I'm asking because i am considering to upgrade about 15 cards to have the "original" instosis deck.

And another question: are there any rumors about nerfs that would touch this deck? I would think that the supernova nerf, the sundial nerf and maybe to some degree the max 75 quanta rule had impacts on the efficiency of instosis.

I searched the forum and couldn't find any answers to these questions. Please excuse me if i have overlooked them somehow. Maybe you would like to point out the relevant thread for me.

Thanks a lot,

i really appreciate the community for all the great tips in the forum and in the wiki. It makes elements special as a game.

Greetz,

Ephesar

[choongmyoung]

Hi everybody!

I have a quick question:

how does the new rule for supernovas influence the instosis deck? Is it a problem that you can only play one supernova per turn safely or doesn't it make any big difference?

I'm asking because i am considering to upgrade about 15 cards to have the "original" instosis deck.

And another question: are there any rumors about nerfs that would touch this deck? I would think that the supernova nerf, the sundial nerf and maybe to some degree the max 75 quanta rule had impacts on the efficiency of instosis.

I searched the forum and couldn't find any answers to these questions. Please excuse me if i have overlooked them somehow. Maybe you would like to point out the relevant thread for me.

Thanks a lot,

i really appreciate the community for all the great tips in the forum and in the wiki. It makes elements special as a game.

Greetz,

Ephesar

Actually, It doesn't matter. If you have to use 2 SN in a row, just use them.
1 Singularity + Chimera is still over 200, 2 Singularities are, 3 are,, Even without the Chimera, Singularity do not matter to your win.
75 Quanta cap is not related to this deck. No quanta will grow above 75 in Instosis, Never.

[Reid4891]

Actually I disagree on previous comment. Singularity can auto-duplicate them, became vampire (dealing damage to you when they attack), play chaos power on themselves, adrenaline, etc. A vampire+adrenaline singularity deals to you a lot of damage and can kill you before your dragons start to attack. You shouldn't use two SN in a row unless you're planning to win in this or next round. Don't make a singularity at the start, definitely.

But still I think there is no big difference, you still need at least 6-7 rounds in order to play the combo, so there isn't a particular reason to play 2 SN in the same round in a normal situation. If the situation requires it, just play according to it (you can even play 3-4 SN in a row and play chimera if you don't need it after, since they are gonna be killed and save you a little damage from enemy creatures).

[Ephesar]

Hey choongmyoung and Reid4891!

Thanks for the quick answers!

I think you are both right. In most of the games with an instosis deck the sn-limitation wont make any difference. And if you are really about to kill the FG in the next round, you can just "risk it".

Thanks a lot!

Gee,

Ephesar

[pulli23]

Actually I disagree on previous comment. Singularity can auto-duplicate them, became vampire (dealing damage to you when they attack), play chaos power on themselves, adrenaline, etc. A vampire+adrenaline singularity deals to you a lot of damage and can kill you before your dragons start to attack. You shouldn't use two SN in a row unless you're planning to win in this or next round. Don't make a singularity at the start, definitely.

But still I think there is no big difference, you still need at least 6-7 rounds in order to play the combo, so there isn't a particular reason to play 2 SN in the same round in a normal situation. If the situation requires it, just play according to it (you can even play 3-4 SN in a row and play chimera if you don't need it after, since they are gonna be killed and save you a little damage from enemy creatures).

Well in last turn you obviously FIRST create the dragons/combo - THEN use the extra supernovas (just before activating sky blitz). That way singularities won't do anything at all.