Phase Of Wisdom [Fun][Upgraded][You think you need CC or PC ?]

[Charming]

                                                                        ! Phase Of Wisdom !

So...i was looking up these Shard Of Wisdoms. As it is a shard that friendly to aether's quintessence,some people uses it on opponents' creatures with a reflective power. I thought about a mono-aether with these,pumping your creatures,this came out.
For a 10 games quick run test,i made a mistake in last game and lost only that. -I played an elite dragon before ai3 played a reflect shield-
It gave me about 160-170 score. -In these 10 games.
Here is the deck :
                                                     

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

808 808 808 808 808 808 808 80d 80d 80d 80d 80d 80f 80f 80f 80f 80f 816 816 816 816 816 816 81q 81q 81q 81q 81q 81q 81q 8pu

As this deck is NOT newbie friendly, (of course a person that can build an upped deck with 6 rares is not newbie)
If you have 2-3 Phase Shields in your hand,and your opponent has no creatures or weapons in field. You can make a dim-chain early and get more coins/EMs .
If your opponent is in a sitauation that can put a reflect shield on field ( ) ,don't use your shards. Rush up with un-buffed dragons.
Pros = Very effective deck. It does not need PC or any CC. Because of dims and shards. Even if your opponent has PC and destroyed your dims,at the same time,you rush with your spell powered-dragons. So it can rush and stall at the same time. Stable starting hand.
Cons. = It's slow but not that slow. If your starting-hand is flooded by pillars/pendulums,don't worry. But can be slow at the moment while you are defencing and ruhsing at the same time.

[furballdn]

Not really original. This has been done before. Also, immortals would be better than dragons.

[Reid4891]

Not really original. This has been done before. Also, immortals would be better than dragons.

+1. I had a similar deck unupped with -5 dragons +5 immortals -2 pillars +2 lobo (vs momentum). It's not a bad deck, but the ultra-popular (in Arena) mono darkness won't allow you to play anything. If you want to play AI3 there is definitely better, especially upped.

[blarp]

I have a deck like this.... Butttt I only use 4 dragons (only need 1 in hand) and use 6 silences instead of shields. It ends up playing very similar to a shard golem rush, but you're guarenteed the immortal golem with the sow buff at the cost of a turn or two of speed. fun to play. that many shields are overkill though.

[Charming]

I have a deck like this.... Butttt I only use 4 dragons (only need 1 in hand) and use 6 silences instead of shields. It ends up playing very similar to a shard golem rush, but you're guarenteed the immortal golem with the sow buff at the cost of a turn or two of speed. fun to play. that many shields are overkill though.

Silences? It locks opponent down,but it does not the creatures. In this deck,shields are better.

Not really original. This has been done before. Also, immortals would be better than dragons.

+1. I had a similar deck unupped with -5 dragons +5 immortals -2 pillars +2 lobo (vs momentum). It's not a bad deck, but the ultra-popular (in Arena) mono darkness won't allow you to play anything. If you want to play AI3 there is definitely better, especially upped.

You can over-rush momentum. Against Mono-Darkness,not much deck has strenght against it. It's ultra-popular,yeah but all decks has a counter of course. This one has Reflect as a counter. And Mono-Dark. But having a specific deck as a counter to this deck does not make this good.
By the way,mono-darkness is ultra popular while grinding arena,this is not an arena deck.

Not really original. This has been done before. Also, immortals would be better than dragons.

I only saw the combo of reflective shield / quintessence / SoW ,if this've been posted already,sorry for my spam. Immortals? Low cost,immortal. Allows you to have more cards/less pillars in your deck but in this,you have enough defence. 5 Drags in this way,looks better.

[furballdn]

http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,39046.0.html
http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,37496.0.html
http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,39555.0.html

Immortals are better since you can get SoWs out faster.

[Poker Alho]

this deck was made when SoW was still in beta, you might wanna check other people's decks before submitting your own to make sure yours is original

[Charming]

this deck was made when SoW was still in beta, you might wanna check other people's decks before submitting your own to make sure yours is original

I did but not much. I said I was sorry for that. If you look depths,there is 7 similiar mono-darkness,and everyone said 'nice..!' to everyone. Changing one card does not make it different but I am not using reflective shields or 'SoFres'

[/quote]

http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,39046.0.html
http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,37496.0.html
http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,39555.0.html

Immortals are better since you can get SoWs out faster.

The reason with playing immortals,that you can put more cards and remove pillars/pendulums. As I'd be talking 3rd link,CC is not needed to rush opponent. Putting shields instead can lock hard more,even if you play immortals.
Putting 2 immortals and sows is better,or putting a dragon with really more sows ? Reasonable target to discuss.
2 Immortals with sows are early,nice addition. But even dragon and sows played after 1 turn against immortals,can outrush hard.

[Absol]

Ugh. Comic Sans. It's hard on the eye with font size that small.
And no, the 7th copy of Monodark will not receive "nice!" feedback. Just try.

[Charming]

Ugh. Comic Sans. It's hard on the eye with font size that small.
And no, the 7th copy of Monodark will not receive "nice!" feedback. Just try.

Okay,i will change the style or bigger writings !
Oh,please. Regen's mono-dark and deckbuilding:101's one only different  2 cards,check the mono-section. They are TOO similiar. Devourers dragons,wep.cc and pc.

[Absol]

If you didn't notice already, i've said the exact same thing. That regen's monodark is only a bit different. Also, while nice, generally it didn't get any credit because it's too similar to the one in Deckbuilding 101.
Check it yourself. No "nice!" feedback. Only people who use it.

[Charming]

If you didn't notice already, i've said the exact same thing. That regen's monodark is only a bit different. Also, while nice, generally it didn't get any credit because it's too similar to the one in Deckbuilding 101.
Check it yourself. No "nice!" feedback. Only people who use it.

Are you trying to flame me ? Think not to.
I am not waiting anyone to say 'nice' to me. I just built this.