Sea Wave | Ocean Wave

[Daguerreo]

I made this card long time ago, but I guess now is the right time to submit this idea.
Whatever opinion or comment is accepted, except "this has been made before" (yes, I'm talking with you).

Updated both version!

Which one do you prefer?

NAME: Sea Wave ELEMENT: Water COST: 0 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 2 | 0 TEXT: Gain when played.	NAME: Ocean Wave ELEMENT: Water COST: 0 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 3 | 0 TEXT: Gain when played. Each turn is generated.

ART: http://www.gdefon.com/download/Art_sea_Wave_nature_sun_sky/423030/2000x1239 IDEA: Daguerreo NOTES: SERIES:

NAME: Sea Wave ELEMENT: Water COST: 0 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 2 | 0 TEXT: Gain when played.	NAME: Ocean Wave ELEMENT: Water COST: 1 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 2 | 1 TEXT: Gain when played. Each turn is generated.

ART: http://www.gdefon.com/download/Art_sea_Wave_nature_sun_sky/423030/2000x1239 IDEA: Daguerreo NOTES: SERIES:

Spoiler for "Old Version":

1st version

NAME: Sea Wave ELEMENT: Water COST: 0 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 3 | 0 TEXT: Gain :water  when played.	NAME: Ocean Wave ELEMENT: Water COST: 0 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 3 | 0 TEXT: Each turn is generated.

ART: http://www.gdefon.com/download/Art_sea_Wave_nature_sun_sky/423030/2000x1239 IDEA: Daguerreo NOTES: SERIES:

2nd version

NAME: Sea Wave ELEMENT: Water COST: 0 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 3 | 0 TEXT: Gain   when played.	NAME: Ocean Wave ELEMENT: Water COST: 1 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 3 | 1 TEXT: Gain when played.

ART: http://www.gdefon.com/download/Art_sea_Wave_nature_sun_sky/423030/2000x1239 IDEA: Daguerreo NOTES: SERIES:

[Cardplayer]

I think this could be an interesting card if played in a water mono deck as it automatically generates quanta when you play it. I like the second one better because I thought it makes the water mono idea more viable as water itself doesn't have a way of providing a health buff and thus the upgraded one of the first version would be worse than the unupped version in a water mono. But I think both versions are pretty good if played in some sort of a duo.

[OdinVanguard]

Overall I like the second version best, but I think it will overshadow spark too much. Particularly the unupped version.

Its attack power should probably be dropped to 2 since it already has a fairly decent ability.

I think an in between is probably best.

Something like

Unupped: 2|0 stats, generates when played
Upped: 2|1 stats, generates when played and an additional after each turn

Also, given the role as a quanta producer, it is probably safe to make upped version cost instead of

[Daguerreo]

Overall I like the second version best, but I think it will overshadow spark too much. Particularly the unupped version.

Its attack power should probably be dropped to 2 since it already has a fairly decent ability.

You are right, I considered Ball of Lightning but not spark, I'll decrese the cost for the unupped one

I think an in between is probably best.

Something like

Unupped: 2|0 stats, generates when played
Upped: 2|1 stats, generates when played and an additional after each turn

Also, given the role as a quanta producer, it is probably safe to make upped version cost instead of

It's a good idea,I'm thinking about it.

To cost should be an "other" card instead of beacuse of the mechanic of the game.

[TheManuz]

Hello Dag!
Nice card you got here. I like the 1st version better, i think OdinVanguard suggestions are perfectly fitting, but i would modify the upped like this:

Unupped (stays the same as OdinVanguard said):
2|0 stats, generates when played
Upped  (-1 HP, +1 ATK, i prefer this since Water has SoP anyway, and you can use the wave itself to power it):
3|0 stats, generates when played and an additional after each turn

Also agree on cost for the upped.

Sidenotes: i like this concept, especially for its flavor, perfectly fitting.
And: THIS HAS BEEN MADE BEFORE! 

[Vangelios]

In 1 turn you can put it and SoP, without needing of pillars

[Daguerreo]

Updated both versions!
Any suggestion?

Now I like most the second one because it allow 2 different strategy for unupgraded and upgraded.

[artimies7]

'Wave,' singular feels spellish to me.

I would personally recommend a  |   creature with 3 | 1 || 4 | 1 stats that generated  per turn called 'Sea Waves' | 'Ocean Waves,' plural. The art is too dramatic to make this a zero-cost.

[Daguerreo]

'Wave,' singular feels spellish to me.

I would personally recommend a  |   creature with 3 | 1 || 4 | 1 stats that generated  per turn called 'Sea Waves' | 'Ocean Waves,' plural. The art is too dramatic to make this a zero-cost.

4/1 for 1  and generator seems too much op compared with damesfly, and IMO keep 2 different mechanic allow you to use them in 2 diffrent way at least

[TheManuz]

The first one is perfect for me!

[artimies7]

'Wave,' singular feels spellish to me.

I would personally recommend a  |   creature with 3 | 1 || 4 | 1 stats that generated  per turn called 'Sea Waves' | 'Ocean Waves,' plural. The art is too dramatic to make this a zero-cost.

4/1 for 1  and generator seems too much op compared with damesfly, and IMO keep 2 different mechanic allow you to use them in 2 diffrent way at least

Well, it can be 2 |1 || 3 | 1 for all I care. I'm just speaking my mind.

Taking another look at the cards, I think the second version is best, if I had to choose.

[OdinVanguard]

Hello Dag!
Nice card you got here. I like the 1st version better, i think OdinVanguard suggestions are perfectly fitting, but i would modify the upped like this:

Unupped (stays the same as OdinVanguard said):
2|0 stats, generates when played
Upped  (-1 HP, +1 ATK, i prefer this since Water has SoP anyway, and you can use the wave itself to power it):
3|0 stats, generates when played and an additional after each turn

Also agree on cost for the upped.

Sidenotes: i like this concept, especially for its flavor, perfectly fitting.
And: THIS HAS BEEN MADE BEFORE! 

Given the changes made to SoP, I think this could work out pretty well

SoP-ing wet Wavetal deck... here it comes!