1
Rainbow Decks / Re: MrSexington's "Rage Quit Deck"
« on: January 12, 2012, 08:02:26 pm »...........would work unupped?This is my unupped version that works oke:
This section allows you to view all posts made by a guest. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
...........would work unupped?This is my unupped version that works oke:
Defense? Where?I know I wouldn't deck out a FG even if I could.
I managed to beat it with a quinted SoR steamy deck + flying eternity rewinding a photon. It could be faster with a pulvy because of the PAs, but well.
Does that have something to do with a specific online server's system clock or something? I got zero hits.I don't know how long it takes for google to add this discussion to the list of things you can search for.
here is a word you really only find one hit in google:Idk if this was pointed out yet, but posting the word is pretty much impossible, you have to use an image and tinyurl the search url
...Lol...
1. prove that a set of elements contains the set of elements it contains.(x^2)+7x-2=4.23402039482
2.solve for x : (x^2)+7x-2=4.23402039482
solutions:
1. Because it does
2. x = an answer findable with wolfram alpha
I think that deck is for "all" FG's and not only for Serket.What's the reflective shield for if its for Serket? Serket has no Jade Shields or any shield for that matter.@Twinbuster, i liked how you put a good newbie deck here, but can you fix your grammer it is hard to understand some of the points you're trying to put there. Your like skipping words and notting adding some words/letters. And serket is not on here at all.This deck definitely works for serket (as long as you pull up a shield before the poison gets too bad), but wings would be preferred for serket.
In fact, let me make a completely new deck for killing FGs right now!
Huzzah!