Elements 1.4

[yee]

I can't wait till we can start testing the actual map. I quess we first need the bestianary completed.

[BeefSupreme]

I can't wait till we can start testing the actual map. I quess we first need the bestianary completed.

yee we do.
I know that was terrible, but I felt like being punny.

[WexMajor]

The quanta x2, x3 etc. is not working for the test deck I am building. How is it so?

[Zso_Zso]

The quanta x2, x3 etc. is not working for the test deck I am building. How is it so?

It does not work when you test it prior to submission, but once submitted and you test it in the "trainer" then it works as supposed to (x2, x3, etc).

BTW, I wish we could modify the description of the deck after it was submitted. I noticed several typo in my submissions 

[Jyiber]

I wish we could modify the description of the deck after it was submitted. I noticed several typo in my submissions 

Same here, strange random letters from typing too fast, spelling errors, and sometimes entirely wrong words...

Anyone else agree that use of forum language should be minimal or absent from NPC descriptions? For example I saw someone "water-bow ftw" and few other times I someone refer to the cards in their deck with our abbreviations and acronyms (eg. SoW, duo-,mono-).

This is me keeping in mind that there are plenty of people who have never been to the forum or ever will be. It also feels out of place, alot of what I think Zanz is doing will strengthen the fantasy aspect of the game and allow more immersion.

[AngelSpirit]

Absolutely loving this update.  I've submitted two NPCs so far, but my focus has always been lore over win-rate.  I don't care if my deck isn't a maximum-efficiency-100%-winrate-speedbow type of deck, but I do care that the cards in the deck are fitting for the theme of the NPC (if that makes sense?).

Submitted two to the server: "Hastega" and "Genesis".  Feedback would be awesome 

Also, a bug: HP is still capped at 500.  Or rather, even if you set your NPC to have more than 500 HP, it will be reset to 500 as soon as the duel starts.

[zanzarino]

Added rating to the stats displayed in the trainer. If you want to resubmit a deck with improved description etc. resubmit the same deck adding a v2 after the name.

[Generation_G34]

just curious, how much will we get if w win against them?

[CuCN]

The reward is going to be based on the NPC level, I'll have to refine the number of spins etc. later.

The electrum reward is probably going to be
Reward = 1 + NPClevel*2
Triple the reward if elite, double if EM. Master an elite to get X6.
This is pretty much what the arena settled upon: level 10 will give 21  , level 50 101 

[majofa]

Since some art is different for the upped version of a card, is there a way to integrate it?

[ioiui]

How are people rating decks in which the creator seems to have made a mistake when submitting it? I've been using precognition and have played a few decks that would otherwise have been pretty fun to play except the mark has been left as chromatic or the wrong element, leading to very easy games as the AI can't play any of its cards (Queen of the Nile and Terminator226 I'm looking at you). It seems a shame to dismiss these decks, but they shouldn't go into 1.4 as they are.  Should these be rated up and corrected later or down as they don't work?

[Marsu]

Obviously Zanz' call, but I'd say if it's a very obvious mistake and everything else is great, upvote... but it'd be interesting to hear from Zanz if he's going to 'finetune' most decks, or if the exact same versions that we are testing and rating atm will make it to the game without any edit. If it is the latter, probably downvote. :p

On another note: It says that we can now also see the rating in the trainer now? How? Am I missing something obvious?