Masters of Generating

[mservando]

Hey guys this is my deck that only uses two creatures :& as you can see this deck is  / I use the mark of  to make the Queen's ability work.If you guys like my deck here is the Import Code:

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

5oc 5oc 5oc 5oc 5oc 5oc 5oc 5oc 5oc 5oc 5oj 5oj 5oj 5oj 5rg 5rg 5rg 5rg 5rg 5rg 5rg 5rg 5rg 5rg 5rp 5rp 5rs 5rs 5rs 5rs 8pn

So feel free to comment.

[Chapuz]

1.- With the mark as your single  quanta generation, you can make 1 fly per 2 turns, what's quite slow and you may be wasting the other queens.
2.- With no  generation at all and no SoRs, scarab spamming just doesn't worth it because it's a slow attack growth per turn. Also, this deck has no defense at all.
I would suggest to make a more focused deck, with only 1 spammer, becuse you need  ,  ,  and  to make it work, and seems very unstable to try it.
The high cost of the creature spammers isn't a detail either.

[Pineapple]

Add SoRs; most problems solved.

[furballdn]

A mark of life is unable to support FFQs. It's nice that you like spawners, but why not focus on one instead of going for two?  You literally have no synergy between the and with , and there's no at all for scarabs.

[mservando]

1.- With the mark as your single  quanta generation, you can make 1 fly per 2 turns, what's quite slow and you may be wasting the other queens.
2.- With no  generation at all and no SoRs, scarab spamming just doesn't worth it because it's a slow attack growth per turn. Also, this deck has no defense at all.
I would suggest to make a more focused deck, with only 1 spammer, becuse you need  ,  ,  and  to make it work, and seems very unstable to try it.
The high cost of the creature spammers isn't a detail either.

Says a guys with wrong grammar.

A mark of life is unable to support FFQs. It's nice that you like spawners, but why not focus on one instead of going for two?  You literally have no synergy between the and with , and there's no at all for scarabs.

I dont intend to use the scarab skill I just use them for attack.


MOD NOTE: Please don't double post. Thank you.

[Naesala]

1.- With the mark as your single  quanta generation, you can make 1 fly per 2 turns, what's quite slow and you may be wasting the other queens.
2.- With no  generation at all and no SoRs, scarab spamming just doesn't worth it because it's a slow attack growth per turn. Also, this deck has no defense at all.
I would suggest to make a more focused deck, with only 1 spammer, becuse you need  ,  ,  and  to make it work, and seems very unstable to try it.
The high cost of the creature spammers isn't a detail either.

Says a guys with wrong grammar.

Grammar=/=Ability to give sound advice, especially when many people on this forum don't speak english natively.. Also, don't double post, it's generally discouraged on the forums.

Use the deck if you like, but it is pretty ineffective as is. With no stalling power, spawners won't be able to summon a legion of effective attackers. You're short on some quanta and have unused light and no gravity.

[Absol]

*guy
Practice what you preach.

[AP579]

1.- With the mark as your single  quanta generation, you can make 1 fly per 2 turns, what's quite slow and you may be wasting the other queens.
2.- With no  generation at all and no SoRs, scarab spamming just doesn't worth it because it's a slow attack growth per turn. Also, this deck has no defense at all.
I would suggest to make a more focused deck, with only 1 spammer, becuse you need  ,  ,  and  to make it work, and seems very unstable to try it.
The high cost of the creature spammers isn't a detail either.

Says a guys with wrong grammar.

...seriously? You made a grammatical mistake...


AAAANYWAY, I don't think there's much synergy between these cards. It just requires too much different quanta, and fireflies are superior to scarabs in attack. You also have excess in the end.

[Chapuz]

1.- With the mark as your single  quanta generation, you can make 1 fly per 2 turns, what's quite slow and you may be wasting the other queens.
2.- With no  generation at all and no SoRs, scarab spamming just doesn't worth it because it's a slow attack growth per turn. Also, this deck has no defense at all.
I would suggest to make a more focused deck, with only 1 spammer, becuse you need  ,  ,  and  to make it work, and seems very unstable to try it.
The high cost of the creature spammers isn't a detail either.

Says a guys with wrong grammar.

So if I said it with correct grammar I would have been right?
Try to accept, or at least analize the feedback you receive from other players. They usually help to improve the posted decks in the forum.

I will paraphrase my first comment:
This deck has no attack, defense, speed or synergies at all. Therefore, you can't win AI3, PVP1 or bronze consistently with it.
If you want to use creature spawners, try to use only 1 type of them and use the generated creatures for something more than just attack to make it more effective.

[Wizy]

me think combo be bad scarab hungry scarab no eat pay 9 win 2 damage/turn effective not
queen wait queen say no this turn wait next turn

[Chapuz]

me think combo be bad scarab hungry scarab no eat pay 9 win 2 damage/turn effective not
queen wait queen say no this turn wait next turn

Absolutely, nada como un poco de humor latino.

[furballdn]

I like this mservando guy. Not only is his sense of grammar impeccable, but the deck he built is absolutely perfect in every way possible as well!