Shards you would like to submit to Shard Revolution competition but you cant.

[Marvaddin]

Well, this is the Shard Revolution competiton (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,28847.0.html) Im sure you all have heard about.

Sadly, each person can submit a single shard idea to the competition, while its goal is to create 8 new cards. This sucks because we are potentially missing 7/8 of the good ideas we could have avaliable. Im pretty sure at least 50% of the ideas will be missing this way. I have created this thread, so people can post here other shard ideas they had but couldnt submit. Its supposed to serve as inspiration to people that still can submit a idea. In fact, I myself wouldnt care if someone get one of my ideas and just submit it with no changes. Our goal here is just make possible more options come to voting phase when it starts. Discussing ideas that are posted is also allowed.

Just to remember, shards are linked to an element, and should provide an advantage to that element.

If you are too lazy about creating the card image, post the idea anyway, and I intend (if I have enough time) create the image.

Oh, just to mention, our card curator, Kuroaitou, gave me permission to start this

Now lets begin!

Some from me:

Earth:
-


Entropy:
-


Water:
-

[dracomageat]

Shard of Materialism 14 | 12
Permanent
Gain 50 if you win with this card in play.

Doesn't belong to a real element and would, in theory, have a golden frame.
This means it can't go into the competition.

[Ace of Souls]

Shard of Perseverance 7 | 6
Permanent
Gain 1 each time a spell is played.

Since this goes with the time element, it's already used by another shard.  Also, this would probably not be added to the game because of its insane synergy with electrum hourglass in a mono time deck.  Get a few of these chards out with a few hourglasses, and every spell card you play allows you to draw a few cards...

[Marvaddin]

Shard of Materialism 14 | 12
Permanent
Gain 50 if you win with this card in play.

Doesn't belong to a real element and would, in theory, have a golden frame.
This means it can't go into the competition.

Interesting, but, you would spend electrum to play this card? Shoulndt be random quanta? Liked the idea, however.

Shard of Perseverance 7 | 6
Permanent
Gain 1 each time a spell is played.

Since this goes with the time element, it's already used by another shard.  Also, this would probably not be added to the game because of its insane synergy with electrum hourglass in a mono time deck.  Get a few of these chards out with a few hourglasses, and every spell card you play allows you to draw a few cards...

Insane sinergy? Looks UP to me. Usually a Pillar could do better. Also, I suppose it will work with time but not to other elements, its not what shards are supposed to do.

[Ace of Souls]

Hmm, I guess as I look at it longer than a few moments, it does seem UP.  I guess, if I were to modify it, I'd make it neutral, zero cost, and provide your mark's quantum.

[dracomageat]

Interesting, but, you would spend electrum to play this card?

You've got to spend money to make money :p.

[Pineapple]

I was planning on remaking Refract, Windswept, and Lithification into shards but I couldn't figure out how to make them elementally biased.

[Marvaddin]

Interesting, but, you would spend electrum to play this card?

You've got to spend money to make money :p.

Lol, dunno if it would be impossible / hard to code. But I think there is no point at it costing electrum. You of course are going to play it before the killing blow, so you will always be able to play it. Playing it with a large amount of quanta would otherwise show some skill, you preserved some quanta to play it. Of course, SN would be a must.

I was planning on remaking Refract, Windswept, and Lithification into shards but I couldn't figure out how to make them elementally biased.

Provide the links to the ideas here and we can think about that together

[Thalas]

Shard of Primordial
4
Reduce the number of cards you and your oppoent can have in hand. If paid only in  , doesn't affect you

[dracomageat]

I think there is no point at it costing electrum. You of course are going to play it before the killing blow, so you will always be able to play it. Playing it with a large amount of quanta would otherwise show some skill, you preserved some quanta to play it. Of course, SN would be a must.

I guess there needs to be an incentive to play it early.

[Pineapple]

I was planning on remaking Refract, Windswept, and Lithification into shards but I couldn't figure out how to make them elementally biased.

Provide the links to the ideas here and we can think about that together

Refract (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,12741)
Windswept (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,19070)
Lithification (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,19078)

[moomoose]

my ideas are jotted down in this thread: http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,28937.0.html