[Official] Plate Armor | Heavy Armor

[RavingRabbid]

This is the victim.

It is used on sparks. And nothing else. There is no other meaning for this card.

Basilisk Blood does a better job if you need a massive HP increase.


My buff proposals are these:


1) More cards that work better with higher HPs (or HPs at all.).
2) A small attack buff (+1/+3), (+1/+6).
3) Get the "Endow" ability for to the creature. It has an armor, why shouldn't it have a sword?

[jmdt]

The card is good for otys and scarabs to increase the eating potential as earth synergizes well already.

[EvaRia]

Would be cool to see +6/+9, but that might be asking too much.

[Ryli]

Agreed with jmdt. I use them on scarabs/otys too, It can be rather devastating to have a 0/11 with devour (or even 0/6, in unnupped environment).

[TheonlyrealBeef]

Unupped is definetly next to useless, and upped one is practically only rarely used for Otyughs or odd decks. Maybe +6 for unupped version as well but make that one cost 2 to start with.

[jmdt]

Unupped is definetly next to useless, and upped one is practically only rarely used for Otyughs or odd decks. Maybe +6 for unupped version as well but make that one cost 2 to start with.

If unupped was 6, it would need more like a 3-4 cost IMO.  6 is huge in unupped where hps are lower.

[zupermannd]

I think it is fine, bacourse as it already is said it is good on otysh, but I do not use it by myself, so maybe it is needed.
according to http://www.elementsthegame.com/liststats.php (http://www.elementsthegame.com/liststats.php) it has been used around 47.000 times since last update, compared with blessing, (which give attack buff) which is used 194.000 times. so it is one of the lesser used card in elements.
notice: if the target get endow (your 3. suggestion) it would no longer work together with otysh.

[willng3]

It is used on sparks. And nothing else. There is no other meaning for this card.

Hermes begs to differ.

[RavingRabbid]

It is used on sparks. And nothing else. There is no other meaning for this card.

Hermes begs to differ.

1) FGs should not be taken in account when balancing
2) Hermes is kickass with or without armor-

[icecoldbro]

I believe it further increases the possibility of fire, earth decks, I like the card as it is Dont specially think it needs buff, maybe a slight increase from 3 to 4 health in unuped but that's about it.

Code: [Select]

77d 77d 77d 77d 77d 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7do 7do 7dq 7dq 7dq 7dq 7dq 7dq 7dr 7dr 7dr 7dr 7dr 7dr 7f2 7f2 7f2

Code: [Select]

778 778 77a 77a 77a 77a 77a 77a 77d 77d 77d 77d 77d 77d 78q 78q 78q 78q 78q 78q 7dr 7dr 7dr 7dr 7dr 7dr 7ds 7ds 7ds 7ds

[willng3]

It is used on sparks. And nothing else. There is no other meaning for this card.

Hermes begs to differ.

1) FGs should not be taken in account when balancing
2) Hermes is kickass with or without armor-

You obviously misunderstood my point completely.  For you to say that it has NO other use besides Sparks is completely untrue.  Hermes is an example of a completely viable strategy that uses Armor.  Scarabs and Otys also function well with this.  So, to make my point more clear this time:  It is usable regardless of how popular we choose to make it out to be.  No buff needed.

[TheIdioticIdiot]

oty+armor is a very good strategy
and i use armor in some upped fire decks too, you would argue that quints do the job better, but guess what? it doesn't... why? quints require 4 /3 , which essentially means running it off the mark is not smart... this costs 1/1 ... much better for splashing, AND the excess can be used to grow them golem/destroyers

/thread