Void Pillar | Void Tower

[Bloodshadow]

NAME: Void Pillar ELEMENT: Other COST: 0 TYPE: Permanent ATK|HP: - TEXT: Destroys 1 quantum of your opponent's Mark per turn.	NAME: Void Tower ELEMENT: Other COST: 0 TYPE: Permanent ATK|HP: - TEXT: Destroys 1 quantum of your opponent's Mark per turn, and when you play this card.

ART: Bloodshadow IDEA: Bloodshadow NOTES: This will be the first card in a series of my pseudo-element Void. The main idea behind the Void element is that there is no such thing as "Void quanta". Instead, whenever "Void quanta" is "spent", your opponent gains quanta of his or her Mark. To counterbalance this, Void Pillars destroy your opponent's quanta. You can put Void Pillars in a normal deck for quanta denial, and you can put other Void cards in a normal deck with the risk of giving your opponent free quanta. Or, you can run a Mono-Void deck that is balanced. Void is going to have a weapon, a shield, a dragon, an alchemy card, and a nymph. Just like any other pillar, you can have more than 6 copies of this card in your deck. Is it overpowered? SERIES: Void (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,21514.0.html)

[ArtCrusade]

Interesting enough, I like it. Sounds balanced as well, since this is not free. It takes space in your deck But it should be limited to 6 or I'd build a deck consisting entirely of Void Towers.

[Midnar]

Interesting enough, I like it. Sounds balanced as well, since this is not free. It takes space in your deck But it should be limited to 6 or I'd build a deck consisting entirely of Void Towers.

And then you would be screwed by any non-mono deck, since Void Towers only denies quantum from your opponent's mark. This card is balanced as it is imo, even as though Void is not meant to be balanced according to Hyroen.

[az4rel]

it seems fine, but in case is not you could always generate 3-4 mark quanta for your opp when the card is summoned

[Bloodshadow]

You can have more than 6 copies of this card in your deck, just like any other pillar. Does this make it OP? But then again, as Midnar said, Void Pillar only works well against Mono decks. And you're not going to win if you put 6 Dirks and 24 Void Towers in your deck.

[Nepycros]

Useful in pestals, and could screw over the opponent near the beginning. I'm game for this. I see a Void Dragon that lowers the opponent's max health, but heals him for amount reduced.

[Bloodshadow]

I made the card images.

Does this card have any problems, or can I submit it to the Crucible now?

[Ajit]

I just now realized this isn't supposed to be part of that Void/Divinity new element series...

Anyways, I think its a nice idea, however, I feel quanta denial > quanta generation.  In other words, its worth more, so a 1 quanta cost I think would be fair.  Just my thought.

[Rutarete]

Just wondering, what made you decide to make it affect the mark and not like a reverse quantum pillar?

[Bloodshadow]

Just wondering, what made you decide to make it affect the mark and not like a reverse quantum pillar?

Reverse Quantum Pillar? If you mean a zero-cost card that destroys 3 random quanta per turn, then it's OP. This is meant to be the antithesis of a regular pillar, not a Quantum Pillar.

As for why it affects the Mark... The reason has to do with other Void cards. When you play a card that costs "Void quanta", your opponent gains quanta based on his or her Mark. I just want Void Pillars to be the opposite of that.

[EmeraldTiger]

Where can i suggest a Divine Element Idea?

[Bloodshadow]

Where can i suggest a Divine Element Idea?

Your own thread. You are not allowed to use my Mark of Divinity, since I might make my own Divine series in the future.