Dark Templar | Dark Templar

[ZephyrPhantom]

NAME: Dark Templar ELEMENT: Darkness COST: 6 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 4 | 3 TEXT: Invisible. Absorbs each turn or loses invisibility.	NAME: Dark Templar ELEMENT: Darkness COST: 6  TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 6 | 5 TEXT: Invisible. Absorbs each turn or loses invisibility.

ART: Krava IDEA: Zblader NOTES: Name inspired by Flayne's card idea Templar : http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,19351.0.html About Invisibility: It will be regained if there is enough quanta to drain. If disabled by AoE CC, it will return the next turn as long as there is enough quanta to drain. SERIES: Duality Series http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,19516.0.html

NAME: Dark Templar ELEMENT: Aether or Darkness COST: 6  or  TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 4 | 3 TEXT: Invisible. Absorbs  each turn or loses invisibility.	NAME: Dark Templar ELEMENT: Darkness COST: 6 or TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 6 | 5 TEXT: Invisible. Absorbs  each turn or loses invisibility.

ART: Krava IDEA: Zblader NOTES: Name inspired by Flayne's card idea Templar : http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,19351.0.html About Invisibility: It will be regained if there is enough quanta to drain. If disabled by AoE CC, it will return the next turn as long as there is enough quanta to drain. SERIES: Duality Series http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,19516.0.html

Dominant Element:  (If this card needs to be categorized, place it under Darkness).

[Ajit]

legit.  Very appropriate thematically I believe.  Good use of the art.  And i like how it doesn't die without quanta, it just loses its ability.

[7wavemaster]

I think the upped is UP compared to un upped.  Just +1/+1 stats for 1500 electrum and an increase in cost?  I think it should stay same price.

[funerallaughter]

easily fractal-able but hard to maintain, but once you do the enemy's firetrucked, I like!
Just a couple of questions:

1. can invisibility be re-gained once it's lost by having enough quanta again?

2. How does firestorm and thunderstorm affect the invisibility? Does it gain it back next turn, provided quanta is sufficient?

[ZephyrPhantom]

easily fractal-able but hard to maintain, but once you do the enemy's firetrucked, I like!
Just a couple of questions:

1. can invisibility be re-gained once it's lost by having enough quanta again?

2. How does firestorm and thunderstorm affect the invisibility? Does it gain it back next turn, provided quanta is sufficient?

1: yes. I will add that in the notes.

2: Invisibility is removed for one turn and comes back if there is enough quanta to drain.

I think the upped is UP compared to un upped.  Just +1/+1 stats for 1500 electrum and an increase in cost?  I think it should stay same price.

This is based off the original Immortal's stats.

[unknown89089]

The enemy might be curious about your randomly disappearing quantum... it would help people be more observative

[7wavemaster]

I think the upped is UP compared to un upped.  Just +1/+1 stats for 1500 electrum and an increase in cost?  I think it should stay same price.

This is based off the original Immortal's stats.

You have any idea how much people think immortals need a buff?!?
http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,11643.0.html

Even you agreed immortals need buff so should this.
http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,11643.72.html

[doublecross]

The point of invisibility isn't to make them not know it is there. It is to make it un-targetable for anything save field covering attacks.

[ZephyrPhantom]

@7wavemaster

The point of invisibility isn't to make them not know it is there. It is to make it un-targetable for anything save field covering attacks.

^This, and at the same time you can still buff it.  This is actually stronger than immortal : you can target it while your opponent can't and it can draw from two quanta pools instead of one, which is countered by the maintainence cost.  Even if it is UP, I'd like to keep it balanced to the ingame cards.

I think Oldtrees would have the perfect resoulution to this argument.

[7wavemaster]

@7wavemaster

The point of invisibility isn't to make them not know it is there. It is to make it un-targetable for anything save field covering attacks.

^This, and at the same time you can still buff it.  This is actually stronger than immortal : you can target it while your opponent can't and it can draw from two quanta pools instead of one, which is countered by the maintainence cost.  Even if it is UP, I'd like to keep it balanced to the ingame cards.

I think Oldtrees would have the perfect resoulution to this argument.

The text says that it absorbs 1 AND 1 .  So thats why i thought it needed a buff.

[ZephyrPhantom]

It'd be pretty strong if it didn't absorb quanta, but I'm still reluctant to buff it because of the current cards.  Oldtrees, Help! *activates the Oldtrees summoning circle*

[Rutarete]

cool card. really cool art. I like it