War #4 - Round 1

[ffun]

I also like this event card very much. It's a great way to introduce war mechanics at a slower pace, with only 2 duels we have to analyse and discuss, instead of being overwhelmed with 8 matches right at the beginning.

I imagine it might be a bit boring to the veterans, but it's very nice for the 1st timers in war, and at least for me the other parts of war besides the duels are interesting as well, so I'm happy even if I'm not playing in the 1st round.

[MartyrX]

I also like this event card very much. It's a great way to introduce war mechanics at a slower pace, with only 2 duels we have to analyse and discuss, instead of being overwhelmed with 8 matches right at the beginning.

I imagine it might be a bit boring to the veterans, but it's very nice for the 1st timers in war, and at least for me the other parts of war besides the duels are interesting as well, so I'm happy even if I'm not playing in the 1st round.

I second that notion

[TheManuz]

I also like this event card very much. It's a great way to introduce war mechanics at a slower pace, with only 2 duels we have to analyse and discuss, instead of being overwhelmed with 8 matches right at the beginning.

I imagine it might be a bit boring to the veterans, but it's very nice for the 1st timers in war, and at least for me the other parts of war besides the duels are interesting as well, so I'm happy even if I'm not playing in the 1st round.

I second that notion

Me too! I feel already very excited for the first battle, if my team was busy with their own match it would be very chaotic!
Instead we have the to discuss our strategies, and we know each other better!
This is how its meant to be: gradual start, and then WOOOOAAAARRRR!

[bogtro]

I have to say, I don't like this round. The advantage seems to be that the newbies will have a more gentle introduction, but I would think that having them sit out is a bit of a turn-off. The disadvantage is that with only 2 duels, it's very easy to RNG lose 24 cards, which is nowhere near trivial.

However, I do like the Event card. I don't generally like RNG any more than it has to be, but I think it's a great idea, it would just be better with all 8 members playing, or if you want a more gentle start, 4 (the top 4 players tend to not be newbies anyway, as they have specific positions), or 6 (Gen+Lt. are most likely not newbies).

[kev]

Please note the duel phase was changed to 2 days long due to the Event Card.

[Avenger]

I have to say, I don't like this round. The advantage seems to be that the newbies will have a more gentle introduction, but I would think that having them sit out is a bit of a turn-off. The disadvantage is that with only 2 duels, it's very easy to RNG lose 24 cards, which is nowhere near trivial.

However, I do like the Event card. I don't generally like RNG any more than it has to be, but I think it's a great idea, it would just be better with all 8 members playing, or if you want a more gentle start, 4 (the top 4 players tend to not be newbies anyway, as they have specific positions), or 6 (Gen+Lt. are most likely not newbies).

I don't quite understand the bold part. All duels are best of five. "Only 2 duels" means, a team can lose only 48 cards this round. It would be much more if everyone fights. That is good for first round.

[Zeru]

I have to say, I don't like this round. The advantage seems to be that the newbies will have a more gentle introduction, but I would think that having them sit out is a bit of a turn-off. The disadvantage is that with only 2 duels, it's very easy to RNG lose 24 cards, which is nowhere near trivial.

However, I do like the Event card. I don't generally like RNG any more than it has to be, but I think it's a great idea, it would just be better with all 8 members playing, or if you want a more gentle start, 4 (the top 4 players tend to not be newbies anyway, as they have specific positions), or 6 (Gen+Lt. are most likely not newbies).

Most of your post is wrong. This card reduces RNG,

[Jocko]

I have to say, I don't like this round. The advantage seems to be that the newbies will have a more gentle introduction, but I would think that having them sit out is a bit of a turn-off. The disadvantage is that with only 2 duels, it's very easy to RNG lose 24 cards, which is nowhere near trivial.

However, I do like the Event card. I don't generally like RNG any more than it has to be, but I think it's a great idea, it would just be better with all 8 members playing, or if you want a more gentle start, 4 (the top 4 players tend to not be newbies anyway, as they have specific positions), or 6 (Gen+Lt. are most likely not newbies).

This obviously reduces RNG involved, since now you only have to guess what decks will bring on only 2 matches, and if you make a mistake, then you only lose 48 cards. Having to do that with 8 matches is a lot harder now that vaults are completely unknown.

[GG]

There're only 5 hours left until battles and the battle results subforum's still full of last war's games.

[TheManuz]

is the deckbuilder the strategist?

[PlayerOa]

is the deckbuilder the strategist?

The strategist is putting all deckcodes for each round into the vault, if that answers your question.

[TheManuz]

is the deckbuilder the strategist?

The strategist is putting all deckcodes for each round into the vault, if that answers your question.

Ok, so there is no need to make a thread, like it's written in OP. That's all i wanted to know, thanks!