stupid fast deck (TTW~5.5)

[Acsabi44]

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

4vj 4vj 5f2 5f2 5f2 7dh 7dh 7dh 7dp 7dp 7dp 7dp 7dp 7dp 7dq 7dq 7dq 7dq 7dq 7ds 7ds 7ds 7ds 7ds 809 809 809 809 809 809 8po

VS. AI3
Games played: 50
Avg. TTW : 5.54
losses: 1
win in 4 turn: 6 times
win in 5 turn: 17 times
EM: 2 times

Would you guys test it and post here? 50 games feels too few to post this in the TTW topic.
Also, feedback is appreciated, but before modifying, please thest if the deck really becomes faster, as of now, every card there has a purpose.

Thank you!

[xn0ize]

its almost same as Napalm's deck....

[lukce]

As he said. And eventhough, this deck's ttw is NOT ~5.5

[Falcon4415]

Acsabi's deck:

Code: [Select]

4vj 4vj 5f2 5f2 5f2 7dh 7dh 7dh 7dp 7dp 7dp 7dp 7dp 7dp 7dq 7dq 7dq 7dq 7dq 7ds 7ds 7ds 7ds 7ds 809 809 809 809 809 809
NG's deck

Code: [Select]

5f2 5f2 6rl 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dm 7dm 7dp 7dp 7dp 7dp 7dp 7dp 7dq 7dq 7dq 7dq 7dq 7ds 7ds 7ds 7ds 7f2 809 809 809 809
Look at them before you post, there are exactly 9 permutations between them (by the rule you are using, USEM=Frogtal=Adrena liferush).

From what I know Acsabi, jmdt is no longer accepting fire rushes as there are a lot in the ttw study and they all are really close in terms of ttw.

EDIT: Why the novas?

[Acsabi44]

novas:
- turn1 crema + nova= dragon
- for turn1 brimstones (crema them, or let them make quanta)
- earlier phoenixes
- groving the golems.

Lucke, I don't know about Napalm's deck but using THIS deck, I got a TTW result of 5.54 after 50 games. Maybe I got lucky with my draws, you're welcome to play 100 or whatever games with it and prove me wrong.

If jmdt is not accepting Immodecks anymore, fine, my aim was not to take a top spot in some topic, but to present the community a good deck.

[lukce]

Lucke, I don't know about Napalm's deck but using THIS deck, I got a TTW result of 5.54 after 50 games.

Now I played 50 games with this deck (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,16764.0.html) and ttw was 5.3 or sth like that. What I want to say that 50 games don't prove anything. Oh and btw when I said that it is similar to Napalm's, I meant that it is the same type of deck.

Oh and btw I have the ttw results on ttw thread. And the other results (ttw=5.5) are after 100 games

[willng3]

Lucke, I don't know about Napalm's deck but using THIS deck, I got a TTW result of 5.54 after 50 games.

Now I played 50 games with this deck (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,16764.0.html) and ttw was 5.3 or sth like that. What I want to say that 50 games don't prove anything. Oh and btw when I said that it is similar to Napalm's, I meant that it is the same type of deck.

Oh and btw I have the ttw results on ttw thread. And the other results (ttw=5.5) are after 100 games

We still need to test Napalm's deck for comparison sake between vNG and V2.  That said, V2 has a TTW value of 5.40 so I would expect a similar Lava Rush to have a value of around 5.5 or so.