(Light Salv) Bonestorm 3 - (Death Lt.) Acsabi44 0

[Bonestorm]

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

5l8 5l8 5l8 5l8 5l8 5l8 5l8 5l8 5l8 5l8 5mq 5mq 5mq 5mq 5mq 5lf 5lf 5lf 5ll 5ll 5ll 5ll 5ll 55s 55s 55s 55s 7k5 7n2 7n2 8pl

Probably the proudest moment of titted up saders. Maybe the entropy still binds to my will a little. His pandes were crap.

Game1: He got his arse out in turn two and sat behind a wall while I chipped away with the saders until I got titan out, his pend draw was mediocre so I endowed them up and only ate one AM after already putting out good damage, which was then quite brutally frozen by what I'll call my pandemonium

Game2: No dragons was the real killer for Acsabi here, good draw on ent, turn 2 arsenic, played a logical game here and tensely won with 1hp.

Game 3: Lots of entropy, one dragon, late Arsenic. My saders miraculously sat up to pande as he only had one TU'd and I chipped my way through a few BWs and he drew a lot of quanta, he had two cards left in his hand, one good pande could wipe the board with the now 4 saders out which would be crippling, if one was a bonewall it was safe, if both were AM it was safe, if both were AM and he topdecked another there was trouble. I decided to endow and both turned out to be AMs - he topdecked Arsenic.

Good games Acsabi44 and Death, good luck in the rest of the round.

[Acsabi44]

Well, I did beat him down to 1HP once...

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

4vn 4vn 4vn 4vn 4vn 4vp 4vp 4vp 4vp 4vp 52g 52g 52g 52g 52h 52h 52h 52r 52r 52r 52r 52r 52r 542 542 542 542 542 542 542 542 542 542 542 71a 71a 8pj

fun fact: Pandes never did kill ONE crusader. Not even unendowed. Not even when I cast 2.


GGs, Bone.

[xdude]

Bonestorm, the Master of Titsader strikes again!

Not sure how the hell you pulled this off. It's either epic luck or, more likely, the deck was too fast. Either way, great job!

[Newbiecake]

Great job Bones! Nice to see you pulling off a solid victory with Titsaders once again.

Hmm one of you need to give match summaries. I'm beyond how Bones managed to beat down Acsabi with all those Antimatters. No early Arsenic/Dragon or something?

[bogtro]

Seems fairly simple. The AMs would have taken several turns to get out (at least turn 6 or so), by which time Bonestorm could have easily had 2-3 endowed crusaders already.

[YoungSot]

Yeah I can only assume quanta problems or bad draws. Congrats on pulling this off, Light.

[xdude]

Great job Bones! Nice to see you pulling off a solid victory with Titsaders once again.

Hmm one of you need to give match summaries. I'm beyond how Bones managed to beat down Acsabi with all those Antimatters. No early Arsenic/Dragon or something?

Well, for one, a 35 deck is more disposed to bad draws than a 30 cards one. But in my opinion this only aggravates the main issue: the deck is severly underquanta'd in both Death and Entropy. You can't make this kind of mistakes vs such a vicious rush.

[Onizuka]

Titan->beat down hp
crusaders take Antimatter/pande bait, when near kill/anti'd endow titan. bless also cancel's anti for saders. Drop everything and endow when in range to kill.

Easy win for light.

[Acsabi44]

Easy win for light.

- Pandes extremely unlucky.
- Slow entropy quanta means I could only play 1 AM in all matches except the last.
- AM and pandemonium work against each other, sadly. (freezing the AMed crusader...)
- Bonestorm played very cleverly, instead endowing 1-2 crusaders when he could, he waited knowing very well that I would right away AM an endowed crusader. He waited for more more more damage on the board so AMing 1 or 2 crusaders wouldn't matter. This tactic nearly backfired in g2 where I had a strong clock with the Arse and I could hold my position with several BWs versus several (4) unendowed crusaders. But bonestorm played very well and tactically.
- Of course, to pull this off, he needed my extremely bad pandes. No amount of clever endowing helps if the crusaders die to pandes before endow, but that was not the case today.

[ralouf]

meh.

Well, for one, a 35 deck is more disposed to bad draws than a 30 cards one. But in my opinion this only aggravates the main issue: the deck is severly underquanta'd in both Death and Entropy. You can't make this kind of mistakes vs such a vicious rush.

Mistake or lack of choice ? you think we're that stupid ?

[xdude]

meh.

Well, for one, a 35 deck is more disposed to bad draws than a 30 cards one. But in my opinion this only aggravates the main issue: the deck is severly underquanta'd in both Death and Entropy. You can't make this kind of mistakes vs such a vicious rush.

Mistake or lack of choice ? you think we're that stupid ?

Didn't quite imply you were stupid. I just meant that a deck with slow quanta loses to rushes. Sorry if I sounded offensive or anything.

[ralouf]

No you were not offensive I'm just mad for loosing ^^

And also you're right our deck is a little low on quanta to stop a big rush, and you sadly came with a big rush good call