I wouldn't have needed a great winning streak to catch up, only 1-2 more wins.
Depends on who you face, vs Nensuru you need 4 wins vs. Bunker or Blascksmith, yes 2 victories.
I think that ELO is currently the best system we can use even though I would have benefited from a "bonus" for more games played. ELO helps those who play more because beating a lower-ranked person still gives a sizable amount of rating.
Yes, ELO is considerably better than KRACH, I am fully in favor of bonus for anyone who plays more, had already suggested for the Jenkar in league 2/2012 and also something similar in this topic, see the answer of Pika. would be a bonus of +10 elo points for each 10 matches. however I have to agree that this is unfair for those who have little time to play or those who enter the league later. Then a maximum limit of matches should also be stipulated, I suggest 60.
To be honest, I lost to Vangelios both because Vangelios played good decks and because I got arrogant. He deserves the trophy he got.
Very grateful for the recognition, in fact you lost because of 3 final defeats matches, only then believe you lost about 40 elo!!, ie you would have a score of ~1677. If you had not played his last 3 games,
But that does not take away my merit because I also had to overcome the same players that you've lost, and win of you too.
after I won Bunker I was sure it was the champion, and the game later against Annele I also put at risk my title, if I lost to Annele, I would lose ~ 15 elo.