1
Rainbow Decks / Re: Fire Lance sudden killer 1.25 (work with no upgrade)
« on: August 28, 2011, 09:56:49 am »
So I should lobo the firefly queens?
Guest Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by a guest. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: [1]
2
Rainbow Decks / Re: Fire Lance sudden killer 1.25 (work with no upgrade)
« on: August 28, 2011, 07:59:52 am »
I had one game against firequeen that was going well, untill he hit me with a firebolt. His elite bees had produced him about 150, or was it 250 fire quanta and she kinda pwned me. Was it just bad luck?
3
Archived Decks / Re: Grabbix
« on: August 26, 2011, 09:35:38 am »
What should I do when enemy has Otygh? Is it fast enough to overcome it?
Should I burrow shriekers to wait to KO or keep them at 8 ATT?
Should I play photons if I don't have an immolation ready to be used for it?
Should I burrow shriekers to wait to KO or keep them at 8 ATT?
Should I play photons if I don't have an immolation ready to be used for it?
4
Duo-Decks / Re: Fire+Time [unupped and sorta fun]
« on: August 26, 2011, 05:09:55 am »
Yes I've heard of pendulums, but for me they are a mixed blessing and this seems to work rather well.
And heavy on time quanta? So far I've almost never ran to problem where I've had too much of it. If I have too much I can put more hourglasses to table and draw more cards. Maybe with upped hourglasses I can see it, but not with the normal. Or that's how I see it. Also the the deck is rather large so drawing even that one factory is quite nice.
And heavy on time quanta? So far I've almost never ran to problem where I've had too much of it. If I have too much I can put more hourglasses to table and draw more cards. Maybe with upped hourglasses I can see it, but not with the normal. Or that's how I see it. Also the the deck is rather large so drawing even that one factory is quite nice.
5
Duo-Decks / Fire+Time [unupped and sorta fun]
« on: August 25, 2011, 01:17:14 pm »
With a quick glance around here I can see that people seem to favour smaller decks. I guess that's because they want to draw the cards that they need. Well I have been playing little bit of card games and if there's one thing I've learned it is that drawing card is good. Usually REALLY good. So with that in mind I wanted to do a deck with drawing cards. With this setup I think I could slap the time components to just about any deck, but this one seems to be working fairly well. I mean AI3 well, not fared well againts Gods yet.
For me, the deck seems fairly balanced and usually I manage to draw few cards to get it rolling. I'm just curious how bad this really is compared to the 'cookie cutter' decks people have devised.
For me, the deck seems fairly balanced and usually I manage to draw few cards to get it rolling. I'm just curious how bad this really is compared to the 'cookie cutter' decks people have devised.
Pages: [1]