1
Death / Re: Round 4 - Decks
« on: April 30, 2011, 02:01:12 am »
EQ does seem like it could hurt Light a lot. I'd be interested to try some variation with that.
This section allows you to view all posts made by a guest. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
To add on to what me and teffy are saying, this is a situation where I would instinctively just really want to click one of the names up there...I always wanted to do that too. It just seems so obvious from a UI perspective.
emphasis added. Obviously you should have a plan, as such a cut should also come with programs being added if not done properly. There are 2 things that politicians hate doing.This is just a terrible excuse for cutting swathes of programs because you don't understand their value, and not sensible policy by even the slightest margin.
Cutting Programs
Funding Programs
This would automatically do the first one, and before its passed, a bill would be passed alongside it that would state which programs congress decided to fund, and then the left and right wingers can duke it out to see which ones of their pet programs would get passed after it is all said and done.
honestly though, which programs would make that big a deal if they were cut?Let's just list the basics for now, as we could be here for a while otherwise.
Understood. The amount of trauma that the mother takes is so immense, that no matter the circumstances, the father has no say.Pay attention, it's not about trauma. It's about the lack of control and choice. That's the difference, for example, between sex and rape.
However, if it's been determined they are physically fit to carry the "parasite", then, at the very least, one should take into account the non-hosting parent's opinion. I mostly advocate the AGE principle, as stated a couple pages ago.So you consider that essentially enslaving a person for nine months is acceptable? This isn't just hyperbole here, you appear to genuinely be advocating that someone should be forced to lose control of their body, have it irrevocably altered, be exposed to health risks, work harder, and undergo psychological and physiological trauma, all on the preference of another person who bears no risk in any part of the process and for whom you've yet to establish any substantive benefit.
You bet it will.Will that tapeworm benefit the advancement of the human race?However, the tapeworm has no potential, and no matter how endearing you find them, they aren't exactly the base components in building a family. >.>Clearly you do not understand how much I love this goddamn tapeworm. I value it far more than any person could even value a child.
However, the tapeworm has no potential, and no matter how endearing you find them, they aren't exactly the base components in building a family. >.>Clearly you do not understand how much I love this goddamn tapeworm. I value it far more than any person could even value a child. Arbitrary distinctions like "potential" or "family" are entirely subjective concerns with no foundation.