349
Deck Help / Re: Frozen Timebow
« on: December 02, 2010, 08:02:01 pm »currently working on balancing the need forTry 10quantum,
quantum,
quantum. may end up too unstable, testing different ratios
![Rainbow :rainbow](https://elementscommunity.org/forum/Smileys/solosmileys/../../../images/Misc/rainbow18x18.png)
![Water :water](https://elementscommunity.org/forum/Smileys/solosmileys/../../../images/Misc/water18x18.png)
![Time :time](https://elementscommunity.org/forum/Smileys/solosmileys/../../../images/Misc/time18x18.png)
![Water :water](https://elementscommunity.org/forum/Smileys/solosmileys/../../../images/Misc/water18x18.png)
This section allows you to view all posts made by a guest. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
currently working on balancing the need forTry 10quantum,
quantum,
quantum. may end up too unstable, testing different ratios
considering pulvy vs steal, tough choiceNot really. The correct choice is Butterfly Effect (with Steal maybe).
uhm which rol/hope is better? this version or controll?It depends. This "rush" version being faster and little more prone to lose is better for coins/time, while the "control" version being bit slower and winning little more is better for coins/games, score/games, and score/time.
Yes, your opinion is that it was the "Right decision", my opinion is that it was "completely utterly BS decision that ridicules the modern democracy". My opinion is, and has been since year 2000, that the supreme court should have made sure that the recount would have been concluded with equal rules how the ballots were counted. And that wouldn't have meant that "your country would have be going without a president for any period of time". There are numerous ways that could have been used instead, one example: Bush chosen for "interim-president" (not likely the actual legal term, but note my language barrier...) for time until the recount is concluded.And you're saying they did the "Right decision" by stopping the recount? In a modern democratic nation the elections of president & parliament are the most important political events, and everything should be done to ensure that the result really corresponds to the opinions (=casted votes) of the people. Here that would have meant that the recount would have been done regardless of the timespan it would have taken, or other hindrances & inconveniences it would have meant. Making it absolutely sure that the correct candidate was to be named for the next president should be the most important thing. Instead the supreme court decided that they rather make a decision by those "various laws that were somewhat at odds with each other" so the recount was stopped and Bush was named winner of elections. They could have made the other decision by making sure the recount was to be done properly.It cannot go on forever. The country going without a president for any period of time is far worse than the possibility that one candidate in a very close race get's the presidency.
The recount itself was found to be unconstitutional, because of the differing rules from county to county in how the recounts would be run. This violates the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment, which states:QuoteNo State shall ... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.This is because 2 ballots could be identical, yet be counted in one county and not the other.
Additionally, it was decided the the deadline for recounts was December 12th (the day the decision was made).
Even though that might be true, you still shouldn't make conclusions of my knowledge based on such a short blanket statement. You should know better than just go judging a book by it's cover as they say.QuoteHow do you know how much I know about this thing? If I'm so wrong about everything I've written here, then point the mistakes I've made and tell me your Truth.Your original post was not something someone who had read anything about the case is likely to have said. You can argue about the particular pieces in their decision, but you just made a blanket statement that the whole decision was wrong.
QuoteThere is no need to post things where the only point is to be inflammatory.QuoteAlso, if you're just going to be inflammatory, then I recommend that you just don't post.Also, if you're just going to be intimidated, then I recommend that you just don't read.
While doing so, you can for example listen some music (from my favorite band, hope you like it):
Now that I think about it lightning ball might a good tech. Might not have quanta to drop enough dragons, but as long as you can play fractal you can get as many BL/LB ( whatever it is) out.No, Ball Lightning isn't that good. Single use 5|0 are pretty useless against Shields FGs use, and on top of that it messes up the mulligan (=automatically getting new starting hand if you don't have any 0-cost cards):
Brick Eater Cremator (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,15196.0.html)Is this scheduled in your test list? I got 5,520 ttw, so it may have what it takes to be in top 3.
5,520 ttw losses: 2 games: 100 - posted by zse
2 Nova, 3 Burning Tower, 5 Brimstone Eater, 2 Crimson Dragon, 5 Cremation, 6 Lava Destroyer, 3 Minor Phoenix, 3 Thunderbolt, 1 Long Sword, Fire Mark.Code: [Select]4vj 4vj 5f2 5f2 6rk 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dh 7dh 7dh 7dh 7dh 7dp 7dp 7dp 7dp 7dp 7dq 7dq 7dq 7dq 7dq 7dq 7ds 7ds 7ds 80a 80a 80a
Little bit slower than hrmmm's V2 with ttw 5,400, but still pretty good. Do also note that BEC has Tbolts, that can alternatively be used for creature control giving nice extra option for tactical moves.
not sure about your definition of game-changer but if they spawn a prominent deck archetype comparable to those such as RoL/Hope, i say that is a game-changer...as you can see, is actually in agreement with what you said zse
but we'll see (once the bug is fixed and whatnot)
in any case, i like to see something comparable to RoL/Hope
that in itself would be good for the environment (more diversity)
i'm try this thing on trainer and it's generate more than 3 with 4 upgraded SC it's generate 30I think the bug was fixed already yesterday. *double checks: yes bug is fixed now*![]()
![]()
test it with unupgrade version
1 SC = 2
2 SC = 6instead of 4 (quote modified by zse)
3 SC = 12instead of 6
4 SC = 20instead of 8
5 SC = 30instead of 10
6 SC = 42instead of 12
testing it in upgraded version
1 SC = 3
2 SC = 9instead of 6
3 SC = 18instead of 9
4 SC = 30instead of 12
5 SC = 45instead of 15
6 SC = 63instead of 18
what is it?
the only thing worse than testing anti-FG deck in trainer is testing anti-FG deck in trainer with cards in development
take everything you've got with a grain of salt
use it to catch any bugs and whatnot, dont get overexcited about it
Kobi your such a buzz kill and we know that already.lol
Even the mighty divine glory falls to this deck..... though I am not sure how often it will happen.It might be surprisingly easy match-up. At least as long as those Soul Catchers are in lower priority for Explosion than SoG and Pendulum. Maybe that part of AI-stupidity gets fixed before this card is in real game though.