169
Archived Decks / Re: Eternal Chaos (with some stats and a guide for grinding FGs)
« on: April 09, 2011, 12:53:01 pm »
here is an EM for the competition 
against Serket:
against Serket:
Guest Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by a guest. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
170
Rainbow Decks / Re: Fire Lance sudden killer 1.25 (work with no upgrade)
« on: April 05, 2011, 09:31:37 am »i keep having a hard time winning with this deck.....i think you should make a deck more suited for killing the fgs......this one im sorry to say SUCKSwell, if you fight FG's with a unupped deck you should expect to lose points. FG's are for gaining money, not score. If you want to gain score you should fight AI3 (but i would focus on money untill you have lots of it).
i tried it...i dislike it, i lost somewhere close to 500 points with it
171
Archived Decks / Re: Eternal Chaos (with some stats and a guide for grinding FGs)
« on: April 04, 2011, 02:52:12 pm »
it isn't an EM (one hp short), but since you don't have the normal win screens for the new gods I thought i should post it.
Akebono
Lionheart: another one almost EM. 2 attack short:
And to me it looks like more than one screen issn't EM while it should be (Miracle and Morte for example). The damage kills Miracle before the healing starts, or am I wrong?
Akebono
Lionheart: another one almost EM. 2 attack short:
And to me it looks like more than one screen issn't EM while it should be (Miracle and Morte for example). The damage kills Miracle before the healing starts, or am I wrong?
172
Rainbow Decks / Re: (1.26) Flay 'Em!
« on: March 27, 2011, 05:40:33 pm »oops, epic fail. srr ^^Erm, we're talking about THIS deck. Not CCYB.Absolutely not true. It's situational, but because of the Elite Fireflies who generate fire quanta you often have enough to buy a lot of golems. Off course this only works if the Queen is upped.By the way... is the Fractal to be used on just the Golems or on the FG cheap Creatures?Fractal is never to be played on Golems. They're too expensive.
173
Rainbow Decks / Re: The-Compeltely-Unoriginal-but-Semi-Original FGBow
« on: March 23, 2011, 09:31:43 pm »
The lack of Time quantum to use Eternity is very frustrating. One Time Tower would solve this problem.
and, Graveyard (upped) has it's good points: upped creatures when you rewind them. So if you don't need to prolong the game, you can use eternity to speed up the damage.
And if you have a extra Time tower the use of hourglasses becomes more easy. Furthermore you can use eternity more often as CC or your own skeletons.
and, Graveyard (upped) has it's good points: upped creatures when you rewind them. So if you don't need to prolong the game, you can use eternity to speed up the damage.
And if you have a extra Time tower the use of hourglasses becomes more easy. Furthermore you can use eternity more often as CC or your own skeletons.
174
In-game Troubleshooting / Re: How to change password &/or email address
« on: March 16, 2011, 02:19:39 pm »What a very very very good new !!!Yes you can
I'll be abble to stop playing with 2 accounts
Hmmm... Can we change the password today on the beta version, and continue tu play with new password with current version ?(without danger ?)
175
Rainbow Decks / Re: (1.26) Flay 'Em!
« on: March 11, 2011, 08:26:55 pm »
I have used this deck to make CCYB, and have had much fun with it. I started with a 10k investment and have now made CCYB fully upgraded (2 days later). I made the money for 24 upgrades with it.
If you only count the FG's below then you get a winning % of 53 (but I upgraded the cards needed for CCYB when I got the money). But if you make less mistakes then me (made a lot XD) you could get higher. This has been over 76 games (only counting the below FG's). Other FG's you should just skip.
FG's you should fight:
False gods won lost
Chaos Lord 4 3
Destiny 0 0
Divine Glory 2 4
Elidnis 5 1
Eternal Phoenix1 4
Ferox 3 0
Fire Queen 4 3
Incarnate 5 1
Lionheart 2 1
Miracle 3 2
Neptune 2 1
Osiris 2 3
Paradox 2 3
Rainbow 1 5
Seism 1 3
Serket 3 3
Skip these FG's:
Akebono 1 5
Dark Matter 0 4
Decay 0 5
Dream Catcher 0 3
Gemini 0 3
Graviton 0 3
Hecate 0 2
Hermes 0 3
Jezebel 0 4
Morte 0 3
Obliterator 0 4
Octane 0 3
Scorpio 0 5
If you only count the FG's below then you get a winning % of 53 (but I upgraded the cards needed for CCYB when I got the money). But if you make less mistakes then me (made a lot XD) you could get higher. This has been over 76 games (only counting the below FG's). Other FG's you should just skip.
FG's you should fight:
False gods won lost
Chaos Lord 4 3
Destiny 0 0
Divine Glory 2 4
Elidnis 5 1
Eternal Phoenix1 4
Ferox 3 0
Fire Queen 4 3
Incarnate 5 1
Lionheart 2 1
Miracle 3 2
Neptune 2 1
Osiris 2 3
Paradox 2 3
Rainbow 1 5
Seism 1 3
Serket 3 3
Skip these FG's:
Akebono 1 5
Dark Matter 0 4
Decay 0 5
Dream Catcher 0 3
Gemini 0 3
Graviton 0 3
Hecate 0 2
Hermes 0 3
Jezebel 0 4
Morte 0 3
Obliterator 0 4
Octane 0 3
Scorpio 0 5
177
Issue Archive / Re: GotP not working
« on: March 10, 2011, 04:23:34 pm »
I had the same bug against T50, but only rarely.
178
Deck Help / Re: farenheit + bolts quik kill
« on: March 08, 2011, 09:29:25 pm »I think some people put a nova or something in, then had a mirror shield. This was because if your opponent gets a reflective shield as well, you could bolt yourself and get them reflected onto your opponent... That kinda eliminates the main problem, but I think they also used Dim Shields to stay alive until the end...that's another deck
What's yours aimed for? What AI level?
I have played with the deck you mentioned for a while (against FG). (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=6758.84 (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=6758.84))this deck was for T50/PVP
but, the previous post explained that this deck is rubisch and doesn't deserve more attention ^^
179
Deck Help / Re: farenheit + bolts quik kill
« on: March 08, 2011, 08:54:40 pm »
Hmmm, I tested this deck out (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,6515.0.html) and it is so much better then mine, so I don't need help with this deck anymore.
180
Deck Help / farenheit + bolts quik kill
« on: March 08, 2011, 02:50:26 pm »
Hi, the idea of the deck is very simple, lot's of pillars, farenheit, and kill with bolts.
With deflag you make sure there are no pesty shields or you destroy other important pernaments.
Rage potion is some extra CC so the opponent can't do to much before middle game.
The bolts can be used to finish the opponent, but are also excellent CC. And sinds you have farenheit they aren't always nessecary to kill.
Farenheit is the main damage doing thing. But when you have an opponent with lots of healing/shields you should hang on to the bolts for killing.
The deck is made for T50/PVP
The questions I have for you guys:
1. Has this been done like thousend times before?
2. Is the deck crappy or good
3. What would you change (RoF's maybe)?
4. I have some SoG's, but then the deck would change to much to a defence deck to my opinion, and then there are much better alternative decks (like: http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,6515.0.html (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,6515.0.html))
With deflag you make sure there are no pesty shields or you destroy other important pernaments.
Rage potion is some extra CC so the opponent can't do to much before middle game.
The bolts can be used to finish the opponent, but are also excellent CC. And sinds you have farenheit they aren't always nessecary to kill.
Farenheit is the main damage doing thing. But when you have an opponent with lots of healing/shields you should hang on to the bolts for killing.
The deck is made for T50/PVP
The questions I have for you guys:
1. Has this been done like thousend times before?
2. Is the deck crappy or good
3. What would you change (RoF's maybe)?
4. I have some SoG's, but then the deck would change to much to a defence deck to my opinion, and then there are much better alternative decks (like: http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,6515.0.html (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,6515.0.html))