Guest Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by a guest. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Just wondering but isn't this the excate same study which jmdt started with decks of 3 versions of the game already been studied ,He started a version 1.27 already.No, you're missing the point entirely. Jmdt's study focuses on TTW, which is only one component of score farming. This study is a review of which decks produce the best score/hour in the form of a measured index called TSE. TTW translates well to PvP rushing, even though it is researched vs. AI3 decks, whereas the decks here focus entirely on gaining EM's for score.
and Italians would have a handicap because nobody likes them.Reading the fine print ftw!
Well i just realized that in all these decks.. there are the new cards. I'm not criticizing them but realize that we don't have to use new cards. There are really good decks from last war that don't use new cards.I agree that we should more strongly consider reusing some of the more successful decks from last war. That being said, it would be foolish to brush aside new cards for the most part, as I believe some of our strongest cards have been released after last war.
Also you can't just make decks that are good combo's with light.Although slower, with all due respect, I feel our strength lies in our ability to work in conjunction with other elements. We just don't stall well or damage well as a mono, but light can be incredible in combination. IMHO, the key is finding the decks which work as quickly and reliably as possible with these goals in mind.
We need to start thinking of specific deck that counter other elements. For example. Life. They have weak creatures and heavy healing. So we would use stuff like stalls or firestorm or fire shield. We have a great strategist to find these strengths against other elements and then we have a great deck builder to make decks with these strategies. So start categorizing/making new decks that counter other elements. Not just good combos.Your comments are astute and well-noted. I added a strategy section to our typewithme page so we can all go in and edit, and perhaps develop more well-directed decks at each specific element. Switching our focus to a more narrow goal should help us to prepare our vault/decks in the next few days so we can perform well in the upcoming war!
Is it as good as your other deck with procogs? Does this work great for pvp?For comparison to other decks in the big picture, follow this link: AI3 EM True Efficiency Study (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,21923.0.html)
Could some1 test Essence's Mastery Despoiler? http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,11412.0.htmlI had included this deck in the first Efficiency Study (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,21530.msg296140#msg296140). While this study was less complete (<200 games), it featured more decks, and I chose the cutoff to be placed at 1000 TSE for the update. I will probably go back and fill in these gaps in the future, but with war coming up, it will probably be a few weeks.
| Games: 200 | Avg ttw: 7.6094 | Avg. sec/game: 75.295 | Wins: 192 | Losses: 8 | Ems: 129 |
6u2 6u2 6u2 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6u3 6ve 6ve 6ve 6ve 6ve 713 77g 7ae 7ae 7ae 7ae 7ai 7ai 7ai 7ai 7ds 7gm 7jr 7tb 7tb 80g| Score gained: 5470 Electrum gained: 6985 Time overall (min.): 250.9833 Score/Hour: 1307.657 Electrum/Hour: 1669.832 TSE (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,21923.msg306645#msg306645)=1168.041 | ttw 3: 0 ttw 4: 8 ttw 5: 24 ttw 6: 50 ttw 7: 28 ttw 8: 23 ttw 9: 26 ttw 10: 10 ttw 11: 10 ttw 12: 2 ttw 13: 3 ttw 14: 3 ttw 15: 2 ttw 16: 1 ttw 17: 2 ttw 18: 0 ttw 19: 0 ttw 20: 0 |