openEtG

[Fippe94]

I do prefer to have a full set of art before talking about redoing art that works just fine for now.

[Submachine]

I do prefer to have a full set of art before talking about redoing art that works just fine for now.

Personally I like how they are now. No need for a change.

[jarozaoz]

Personally I like how they are now. No need for a change.

Like Spike, i dont actually think does shards need to be changed. Im jst in love with their arts. ♥

[Submachine]

Personally I like how they are now. No need for a change.

Like Spike, i dont actually think does shards need to be changed. Im jst in love with their arts. ♥

Hey, I'm not Spike. I'm Submachine. o-o

[jarozaoz]

Sorry Sub. xDD
Im always mispelling you im my brain with my senpai~ ♥

[TheManuz]

For Shards, I think it would make sense if the arts are the gems representing the elements or colors:
  Ruby
  Sapphire
  Aquamarine???
  Diamond
  Quartz
  Obsidian
  Emerald
  Amber
  Turquoise
  Amethyst
  Topaz
  Gold

It may feels much like Battle Spirits, though.

I solved a similar problem when i made my Gem Factory serie.
Here is the table i've come up to:

	Turquoise
	Sapphire
	Obsidian
	Charoite
	Zircon
	Amethyst
	Ruby
	Amber
	Emerald
	Diamond
	Chrysoberyl
	Aquamarine

[ARTHANASIOS]

Ajit has already created a gem series which can be found in here.

Here is Ajit's list:

	Turquoise
	Sapphire
	Moonstone
	Opal
	Peridot
	Amethyst
	Ruby
	Garnet
	Emerald
	Diamond
	Topaz
	Aquamarine

[Monox D. I-Fly]

Air is more like Azure. Light maybe Opal? Also, I'm not sure if Turquoise is a gem, plus i think Amber is only solid wax. Death should be Bloodstone, a fictional ore.

The sole reason why I didn't put Azure in  was also because I was not sure if it was a gem, plus Pearl (like Amber) is also often considered a gem despite being living creatures' product. Let's face it: Several types of gems are stones, the others are metal, and the rests are biological like Amber and Pearl. Even I as an OCD person totally accept it now.

I think Diamond would be good for ... Tourmaline could work for ... it can have a very nice sky blue color.
http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?action=post;quote=1140681;topic=52763.996

Kyanite is another good option for
http://www.gemstonebuzz.com/kyanite

Never heard of both Tourmaline and Kyanite, thanks for reference. The name implies that Kyanite is blueish, though (Cyan).

I solved a similar problem when i made my Gem Factory serie.
Here is the table i've come up to:

	Turquoise
	Sapphire
	Obsidian
	Charoite
	Zircon
	Amethyst
	Ruby
	Amber
	Emerald
	Diamond
	Chrysoberyl
	Aquamarine

Never heard of Charoite, Zircon, and Chrysobery either. Going to look at your thread after this.

[Chapuz]

I think that the name of the shards should be kept. They represent their abilities.

[Submachine]

I think that the name of the shards should be kept. They represent their abilities.

Agreed.

[OdinVanguard]

Changing topics back to general Art suggestions, here is my suggestion for Lobotomizer:



I recently came across it when looking through my old image folder searching for something else... I made it for the Caldablog card idea someone had a while back (back when I still had Bryce7) but I think it works very well for Lobo!

[Monox D. I-Fly]

I think that the name of the shards should be kept. They represent their abilities.

To be fair, we didn't suggest the shards' name to be changed. We just suggested their arts to be the representing gems.