thanks for reply and idea ... just think about it a bit of deeper ... every mark has own advantages and own weaknesses ..
That there is the beauty of elements
rainbow has not ANY ..
While the common rainbow deck does have fewer weak spots than, say, a duo or a mono, it does have it's disadvantages:
Take a look at the False God, Dark Matter. This god was practically engineered to counter rainbows, Black Hole swallows up 3 of every quantum, gravity nymphs do the same effect at a cost of 3
.
Look at the rare weapon, Discord. This weapon has the ability to scramble up to 10(?) quanta from any element.
And finally, you have your staple
PC and
CC.as you have written above sure you are very limited to build mono/duo deck which will rock against rainbow .. listen up:
i'm just convinced, that due to the added mainly spells, permanents or weak creatures having spell the balance went somewhere beyond a chance to play with nice deck which has some concept against rainbow which is just played by the most of people ..
New cards are new cards, you just have to learn to deal with them. I suggest that you even try to build some decks with them, you'll see their usefulness then.
we were been in past using creatures to kill opponents and shields to defence .. they were crucial card for getting won .. now it's spells and other permanents which is annoying and inane ....
I'm not quite understanding what you mean here...
why we're defeated by someone having not any creature ??
Because you probably didn't have any CC
ps. thanks for pointing me at that shak'ars revenge topic ...
No problem.
BTW: It's a very good deck, you should try it out.
