Your accuracy is 8/8
Silence is mostly used to break dial/dim/sosa chains (the last a bit harder due to stackability of sosa)
PU duplicates buffs, & gains instant value if your opponent plays anything big (grabbow's shriekers, immorush's golems, dragons). Mono Aether as a rush can run Psion/Recluse/SoW, then decide based on matchup whether it wants a psion with +4 attack or a recluse with +4 attack. You ignored this buff synergy in declaring PU "desperate, so balanced"
Lobo analysis skips interaction of stunting momentum/psion as a counter to dims, & how lobo allows psion decks to overcome reflective shields
You say Aether is expensive, yet compare Psion to Sapphire Charger. Lightning isn't expensive. SoW is very cost effective, especially when spell damage immortals are immune to the main drawback of buffing strategies (CC destroying both creature & buff). SoW is efficient enough that it makes immortals almost capable of rushing
Saying Turquoise Nymph is good because it appears to be better than Anubis is short sighted. 1) Anubis is a bad card. 2) Anubis's health makes it more capable of surviving a turn to quint itself. 3) Anubis's ability costs less to cast, making the aether cost payable through mark. 4) the cast cost doesn't matter because you'd run SoR so that you can double cast quint the turn you play Anubis
Falling away from points of argument with "That's just your, like, opinion, man" makes people less inclined to inform you of error, because it appears to be a waste of time to them. Decide: do you want people to give you feedback, which you'll internalize & grow from, or do you want people to ignore you, while you post these mock treatises
Tho apparently you say, "this thread isn’t about my opinion"
