You're not trying to be rude, but you're posting what elicits a "Cool story bro" response. People doesn't earn a living off this forum, quite the opposite. We go out, get a normal job, then after paying bills, spend some on this forum for the community. Crockett shouldn't've been sarcastic really,
we've tried supporting the forum without ads. In the end anti picks up the tab to make up the difference, & he supports that you don't need advertising, but then reconfirming his opinion.. it seems so redundant. If you're going to be redundant, there are basic protocols that allow communicating support for a statement, such as posting "+1"
I'm probably going over the top here, & your initial remark wouldn't illicit such response from me, but the follow up on explaining how you weren't being rude ended up being counter to the statement. It's as if I were to say "I don't hate women, but I think it's wrong they're allowed to run corporate entities" it sort of nullifies the initial statement. So there, I've put up a strawman fallacy for you to fallacy fallacy me & move on