Elements Mafia 73 - by PlayerOa

[rob77dp]

Torb - just noticed you stating d1 start you're not voting... Interesting

[rob77dp]

I'm not familiar with your playstyle but I do enjoy making a read off how I get read by others.

I shoot down anyone with logical fallacies. Your ability usage takes the cake so far.

logical fallacy? If you mean a play choice with a negative outcome in hindsight then ok (but that isn't a logical fallacy).

[TheonlyrealBeef]

I'm not familiar with your playstyle but I do enjoy making a read off how I get read by others.

I shoot down anyone with logical fallacies. Your ability usage takes the cake so far.

logical fallacy? If you mean a play choice with a negative outcome in hindsight then ok (but that isn't a logical fallacy).

No. People that come up with plans or explanations that do not add up as a benefit for town. For reasons I stated earlier, killing Coffee does not help town at all. The chances of someone inactive THAT early being mafia is not any higher than just shooting a random person. If you did not want town wasting time on him, why are we wasting time on you now? You just went ahead and killed someone only to shift the spotlight to yourself.

[rob77dp]

Yeah, because that's exactly what scum do is that last statement: kill someone knowing it will be revealed they did it just to pull the spotlight into myself. I think your case on me is bad at best and wolfy at worst.

[TheonlyrealBeef]

Yeah, because that's exactly what scum do is that last statement: kill someone knowing it will be revealed they did it just to pull the spotlight into myself.

No, which is where that other previous statement of mine comes in that you were criticizing to begin with:

• This bold stunt is not something an organized mafia would ever DARE to do in this community. And if rob would be part of it, it would be organized mafia.

If a good player that does that seems too smart to do something so stupid, people end up misplaying in response. Like not lynching him. This can be taken advantage of by said player.

[rob77dp]

Sooo, you're saying that you think I might be a wolf because I made a play with a negative town outcome to draw spotlight on myself expecting people here to think I'm too smart too be that dumb as a wolf and thereby townread a wolf--rob for it?

Lol there's no way that is a real thought? From my position, that feels quite fabricated... Keeping my vote where it is. Let's say you could vote - would you be voting me right now

[shockcannon]

Spoiler for Do not read this if your name is kaempfer. I know you have the discipline not to. I will know by your future posts if you have read this. Trust me.:

I am quite certain kaempfer is town. However, it is very important to me that he does not know that I think this. DO NOT QUOTE THIS POST OR I WILL VOTE YOU UNTIL YOU ARE DEAD.

[serprex]

Spoiler for Do not read this if your name is kaempfer. I know you have the discipline not to. I will know by your future posts if you have read this. Trust me.:

I am quite certain kaempfer is town. However, it is very important to me that he does not know that I think this. DO NOT QUOTE THIS POST OR I WILL VOTE YOU UNTIL YOU ARE DEAD.

rob77dp (2) - Linkcat, serprex
MasterWalks (1) - DoubleCapitals
TheonlyrealBeef (1) - rob77dp

[TheonlyrealBeef]

Sooo, you're saying that you think I might be a wolf because I made a play with a negative town outcome to draw spotlight on myself expecting people here to think I'm too smart too be that dumb as a wolf and thereby townread a wolf--rob for it?

Lol there's no way that is a real thought? From my position, that feels quite fabricated... Keeping my vote where it is. Let's say you could vote - would you be voting me right now

No, not a townread per se. Just being able to get away with it by people not sufficiently scumreading you for it. You don't need to get townread over it if you're mafia, just reducing town's numbers without concrete consequences is enough.

Regardless of whether I can or cannot vote, I am choosing not to. I will not be silently agreeing that I simply cannot vote. But yes, most definitely.

[MasterWalks]

iancudorinmarian (1) - serprex
Sub (1) - rob77dp
rob77dp (1) - Linkcat
MasterWalks (1) - DoubleCapitals

throwing my vote here then until MW responds to him seemingly FoSing ian (the gaslight comment) for what I can tell was just N0 banter

All I hope is MasterWalks doesn't get some blocking ability again and spams it for no reason

I think ian is gaslighting here. He is trying to get me to tunnel on him. People wont believe me if i say to lynch him since they will think its because of this comment. This is sketchy.

lol i dont have scum read on ian, just giving banter back.

[MasterWalks]

Also, i agree with shocks last message

[serprex]

Scum reading torb is wrong. His decision making here matches his deck picking style in matches: play standard & consistent, leaving it to his opponent to start making things weird & only outdoing them on that front if forced to. According to that line of reasoning rob brought unnecessary complication. Personally not a fan of how rob's handling the response to his response to the response to his devour

Not voting is good while you agree with the tally. Gives a wide net for who could be graboid. Even if GN is off the table, there's still nice roles out there like Psion & FFQ. Let mafia have to risk missing on graboid if they want to go after the no-vote crowd