Angels On Fire

[Klaymore]

Was trippin around in the trainer with the combo rage+heal and came up with that deck which probably very few can make because of the 3 red nymphs... Anyway it does fairly well in Top50 AI3 maybe PvP and very fun to play 
I think with only 1 nymph and 6 rage pot it might actually still work decently

by Klaymore

Hover over cards for details, click for permalink

Deck import code : [Select]

5fk 5fk 5fk 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dg 7dm 7dr 7jo 7jo 7jo 7jo 7jo 7jo 7jo 7jo 7ju 7ju 7ju 7ju 7jv 7k0 7k1 8po

[TheOwner]

If you have no red nymphs, this combo works rather nicely...

 

Code: [Select]

7dr 7dr 7dr 7dr 7dr 7dr 7la 7la 7ju 7ju 7ju 7ju 7ju 7ju 7jv 7jv 7jv 7jv 7jv 7jv 7dl 7dl 7la 7la 7la 7la 7la 7la 7la 7la

[Higurashi]

Hehe.. takes me back to my old Zealots of the Red Sky (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,8336.msg103328). With Nymphs, this becomes even slower. A domination deck like that could work with Fire Shields and Miracles for survival to make it more of a stall, perhaps? Mm.. we may be getting closer to a useful idea from this concept.

[geekz_always_win]

6 Rage Elixirs are better than nymphs.

First of all, you won't need more than 6 to beat someone with only 100 health, provided you still use Blessings. Nymphs will cost much more than 6 Rage Elixirs, 6 Rage Elixirs is 18 Quanta only and 3 Nymphs are at least 24 quanta alone without using any abilities. That means you can slim down the deck and use less pillars, which makes it even faster.

[Higurashi]

Better? No. Different? Yes. This deck isn't fast, and neither is my version with Potions/Elixirs. If you wanted to make this faster, you'd go that route. Do you? I'm starting to see more use out of this in a slower deck. Those Red Nymphs are awesome for CC.

[Klaymore]

Yes this deck was designed with fun rather than efficiency in mind : with nymphs you easily end up matches against stall decks with monstruously buffed creatures