Rainbow Mark :o

[Vipy5]

this is an idea for a mark, that generates three random quanta every turn, so it basically a quantam tower gone mark...

[Nepycros]

Probably won't work. I think that Zanzarino planned this game so you'd at the very least have to align with some sort of element. Besides, how would this work with Pendulums? Now they suddenly produce 4 quanta over 2 turns.

[ZephyrPhantom]

I tried suggesting this a while ago (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,18636.0.html). It got shot down quicker than you could say Rainbow, so I don't think it is liked.

[Time_lord_victorius]

maybe we're looking at this the wrong way 8).

maybe it should be a mark that gives 1 quanta of a random element every turn. this would fit slightly more into the mark mechanic...yet saying just that is an oxymoron in a way

[ZephyrPhantom]

maybe we're looking at this the wrong way 8).

maybe it should be a mark that gives 1 quanta of a random element every turn. this would fit slightly more into the mark mechanic...yet saying just that is an oxymoron in a way

That just makes it plain inferior to other marks considering Quantum Tower. I'd rather use a normal mark so I could prioritize on a single element's cards like Entropy for Supernova and Time for Precog.

This idea is generally disliked because Marks are supposed to determine your element, and theorectically there is no rainbow elemental. As cool a concept as it is I don't think Zanz is willing to implement it in the game.

[RootRanger]

I realize why people don't like quantum marks, but what about a Mark Card of Quantum, that could be won from tourneys.
Seems a little unfair that 12 pillars have mark cards, but 1 does not.

[ZephyrPhantom]

I realize why people don't like quantum marks, but what about a Mark Card of Quantum, that could be won from tourneys.
Seems a little unfair that 12 pillars have mark cards, but 1 does not.

That might be be an interesting way to get around the constraint of it. We even have art, so why not?

[OldTrees]

I realize why people don't like quantum marks, but what about a Mark Card of Quantum, that could be won from tourneys.
Seems a little unfair that 12 pillars have mark cards, but 1 does not.

A mark card implies a mark. Marks represent elementals. There are no rainbow elementals therefore there are no rainbow marks.
There are no rainbow mark cards because there are no rainbow marks.

[Time_lord_victorius]

this puts us back at square 1.

what if we could... OMG, briliant idea!!!!! 2 extra elements! rainbow and... bloodshadow's pseudo element: void! this mark, void, however would work as a void pillar; it drains one quanta from the opponent!

this makes sorta sense in a way.

[EvaRia]

That would make Void mark kind of insanely powerful with Pends =P

[OldTrees]

this puts us back at square 1.

what if we could... OMG, briliant idea!!!!! 2 extra elements! rainbow and... bloodshadow's pseudo element: void! this mark, void, however would work as a void pillar; it drains one quanta from the opponent!

this makes sorta sense in a way.

What if we could just use Other? Bloodshadow intends Void to be a subcategory of Other cards. Also void being a lack cannot be a type of element/elemental hence no Void mark either.

[Seraph]

this puts us back at square 1.

what if we could... OMG, briliant idea!!!!! 2 extra elements! rainbow and... bloodshadow's pseudo element: void! this mark, void, however would work as a void pillar; it drains one quanta from the opponent!

this makes sorta sense in a way.

What if we could just use Other? Bloodshadow intends Void to be a subcategory of Other cards. Also void being a lack cannot be a type of element/elemental hence no Void mark either.

In pokemon tcg, there is a "double other" energy, although there really aren't enough other cards for this to happen, and then there would need to be an other quanta pile

Now that you have laughed at me for loving pokemon tcg,... Magic has a double other land also.