Pumpkinhead | Jack O'Lantern

[moomoose]

NAME: Pumkinhead ELEMENT: Darkness COST: 4 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 2|2 TEXT: : Pumpkin Toss a pumpkin onto a random location in the opponent's field.	NAME: Jack O'Lantern ELEMENT: Darkness COST: 4 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 4|4 TEXT: : Pumpkin Toss a pumpkin onto a random location in the opponent's field.

ART: hawanja http://freakmutantmonster.blogspot.com/search/label/pumpkin IDEA: moomoose NOTES: *pumpkin can have 2 possible effects, dependent on if it lands on a creature or an empty space on a creature- Deals 3 damage and creatures that survive the hit gain gravity pull effect.  on an empty space- places a pumpkin icon in the slot, should a creature be played in that slot, each turn the creature will have a chance to have its atk reduced by 2. (I suppose setting a maximum to reducing it by 6 would be prudent) SERIES:

[Retribution]

The card itself seems okay, the upgrade is just way too powerful...
Almost all your card upgrades are kinda way too powerful >.>

[TruePurple]

With one of my cards, some have accused it of being too complex. I was told if it didn't fit into the 4 lines of text on the card, it was too complex. No way that pumpkin text could fit into 4 lines, or perhaps even double that.

[moomoose]

ret- which part is too powerful? that would be much more helpful feedback

noob- look at the card.  it has sufficient information.  not every detail has to be in the card.  also, it isnt "toss a pumpkin.  also, is immune to damaging spells.  oh, and it also removes immortality of all creatures on the field.  and it gains +5|+5 when targeted by parallel universe.  blessings cause it to gain twice as much atk.  on tuesdays this card gives you a free hamburger.  instantly kill target card if you consider the target card to be OP."

edit- thanks to SG for the link to setting up an ignore list so i no longer have to see truepurple's inane posts http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?action=profile;area=lists;sa=ignore

[killsdazombies]

so mean moomoo.
i would change attack/hp to 3/3 and raise cost by 1 to account for the lower ability activation. if you consider it UP then make it 3/4. that is all.

[AeonSiege]

Theres too much difference between Pumpkinhead and Jack O'Lantern, I think thats why Jack O'Lantern may seem OP in comparison with Pumpkinhead. I think Jack O'Lantern is fine, but Pumpkinhead seem UP for me. IMO Pumpkinhead should cost 2 or 3. Here's why:

Pumkinhead     Cost 2 = 2 [Attack] - 1 [HP<4] + 1 [Ability] - 1 [Duo ability and expensive]
Jack O'Lantern     Cost 4 = 4 [Attack] + 1 [Ability] - 1 [Upgraded]

[ddevans96]

I also think the upgrade is OP compared to the unupped, but it's a very nice idea, and funny too

[moomoose]

thats a nifty formula aeon, do you have a complete list of values somewhere? could take some of the guess work out

[ddevans96]

thats a nifty formula aeon, do you have a complete list of values somewhere? could take some of the guess work out

I think it is related to PF's mechanics of card cost.

[AnonymousRevival]

The upped card seems to be a little OP, by the fact that not only the attributes increase, but the skill as well. Also, are you sure  is the right element for this skill?

[AeonSiege]

@moomoose - as ddevans96 said, the equation is in the mechanics of card cost - creatures (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,10994.0.html) thread in the design theory section.

I don't think any of this cards are OP because of the randomness in their abilities, but surely they would be very fun to play. Me like it.