Sagaris | Pollaxe

[OdinVanguard]

I see it with .  Rather, it's just a feeling, but I agree.  I can't sense the .

Yes, entropy is trickier. Without breaking the mold of the +1 damage for mark though, its harder to make a thematic tie... I was thinking that weapons of this type are meant mainly for war, and therefore the chaos that inevitably accompanies it. If I end up needing to go with a less vanilla ability it will be easier to work with. (maybe have it deal a random amount of extra damage)

[OdinVanguard]

As some have suggested that adding more vanilla weapons may not be popular,
Here is a non-vanilla version. Will be posting a series soon.

[Rutarete]

I think the cost for the upgraded should go up 1 or 2, for the +3 attack boost. I'm sure I'd use this if in-game, but I'm wondering if a 3 life would be better for balance.

[OdinVanguard]

Yes, I was debating whether or not to make the damage bump equal to the health cost.
Adding 1 to cost for upped seems reasonable, I was simply building from the template of the other non-rare weapons. They alls seem to get doubled damage at no extra cost when upgraded. (Hammer, short sword, and short bow all go from 3 to 6 damage for same cost). I will work on updating it in a bit.

[TheManuz]

I really like the concept, but i think it will be better with
0 fury: pay 2 life to add 2 damage this turn (max 4 unupped |max 6 upped, or maybe 6|8, i don't know).

I think that you still have a benefit from this, and i think that it should not be pushed too much, since it's an "other" card.

Wonderful card for rushes, btw!

[blarp]

first of all, the cost should be at least even with the damage you do. take 2 deal 3? why not. best of all you can choose when during all of those situational times. also it's a little cheap in cost.