Forest Monster | Swamp Monster

[oblivion1212]

mass intended... sarreh, forgot to add
(posted first comment while playing fractal-condor thing)

[karis]

ok  ready for crucible.   

[Ikerpeta]

I would do 3/15 the upped version at same 6 cost or even more hp, great card might be a nice add to life and totaly fits with the elements

[Marsu]

Is 3 attack a wise choice? You could simply play something like 6 frogs 4 of this card 6 adrenaline and could use this card as a perfect source for adrenalin if you had a bit of bad luck with your frogs.

/e: Besides, the synergy with BB wouldn't be "nice" - it would be a free win against any deck with removal in it except time. I smell op.

[Zenith76]

I'll admit, I like the idea of it.  Worst case senario, its a fireball instead of a deflag or a steal, so I don't think it would be too unbalanced at all.  I lie it, voted up.

[Zenith76]

Is 3 attack a wise choice? You could simply play something like 6 frogs 4 of this card 6 adrenaline and could use this card as a perfect source for adrenalin if you had a bit of bad luck with your frogs.

/e: Besides, the synergy with BB wouldn't be "nice" - it would be a free win against any deck with removal in it except time. I smell op.

also, I think reverse time would work just fine against the bb trick.

[Alchemist]

I agree with the author of "Forrest/Swamp monster" that elements need few more ways to protect artifact besides PA or cloak. Creature that does it is a necessity. Although, I do find him 2 strong for task like that. First, Life element is great for synergy with FM - lots of permanents there, second, adrenaline + 3 attack = 12 attack. Ok, its 2 cards and 10  , but this way for 10    you get creature that hits like red dragon, has more HP than green dragon, and protects 3 artifacts... So, I think that he should have less HP and att. Ofc cost of it should be reduced also. I was thinking more like 1|6 for 3  unupped. Why? because this card shouldn't be good attacker. Upped version could be like 2|6, but it takes only 2 dmg for permanent destroyed. And attempt of stealing while FM is in game could also trigger his skill.

[Aroodwen]

Potentially change name to Forest Guardian? Because a monster just doesn't sound like it would protect your cards. =p

[Annele]

I personally don't think a -2 cost deserves -2hp. Maybe -1 cost, and leave hp the same? Or, as has been suggested before, +1 cost and increase hp.

[Chapuz]

yaaaaaaaaayyyy I like the concept!!!

[Vangelios]

I think life needs strategic cards, primarily for protection, and this card is very nice, just needs a polishing subtle

[choongmyoung]

I agree with the author of "Forrest/Swamp monster" that elements need few more ways to protect artifact besides PA or cloak. Creature that does it is a necessity. Although, I do find him 2 strong for task like that. First, Life element is great for synergy with FM - lots of permanents there, second, adrenaline + 3 attack = 12 attack. Ok, its 2 cards and 10  , but this way for 10    you get creature that hits like red dragon, has more HP than green dragon, and protects 3 artifacts... So, I think that he should have less HP and att. Ofc cost of it should be reduced also. I was thinking more like 1|6 for 3  unupped. Why? because this card shouldn't be good attacker. Upped version could be like 2|6, but it takes only 2 dmg for permanent destroyed. And attempt of stealing while FM is in game could also trigger his skill.

^
But I suggest little different stats.
(Unupped)4:life, 1|6, 3 damage per permanent destruction.
(Upped)4:life, 1|9, 3 damage per permanent destruction.

BTW, Forest Monter + BB will be an interesting combo.