Competition: Result Modifiers

[seulintse]

I've been looking at this for awhile... and honestly, it looked like a good bit of fun

Spoiler for Its dangerous to go alone! take this!:

condition:win without including a weapon in your deck
reward:+30 electrum and +15% score

Spoiler for should have had a PA:

condition: deflag, pulverize, steal, or destroy via other means than shard of focus 3 non-quanta producing permanents. One pillar counts for every one non-quanta producing permanents that isn't played by the opponent. this condition also requires that your opponent doesn't have a PA anywhere in his deck, regardless of whether it was played or not.
reward:for every card you win from the spins, gain one spin with all upped PC and anti-PC cards (trident, pulverizer, steal, deflagration, butterfly effect, and PA) but no shards of focus.

Spoiler for hat trick:

condition:play a three-or-more card combo that in total deals 30 damage or more that lets you win before your next turn.
reward:gain 1/3 of the base reward for the level or arena bracket you fought. EMs+hat trick only give you 7/3 (2 times electrum and +1/3=7/3). Also, + 5% score for every card played on your last turn.

Spoiler for ♪I've been grinding on the railroad♪:

condition:use six of any shard in a mono deck
penalty: lose 20% of your electrum and 35% of your score from that game

These may be subject to change.


EDIT:I axed using 6 dim shields from the "I've been grinding on the railroad" condition list because using mono-aether with chaining four-or-five dim shields is, however annoying, still a strategy in-and-of-itself.

[CrockettRocket]

you can change the word "reward" to "penalty" like many others before you have when its a consequence.

[Opsinis]

SUBMISSIONS LOCKED

GO VOTE HERE