Twilit Pariah | Twilit Pariah

[Drake_XIV]

NAME: Twilit Pariah ELEMENT: Light COST: 4 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 2 | 4 TEXT: : Condemn Twilit Pariah and target creature both get -2/-2.	NAME: Twilit Pariah ELEMENT: Light COST: 5 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 4 | 6 TEXT: : Condemn Twilit Pariah and target creature both get -2/-2.

ART: IDEA: Drake_XIV NOTES: SERIES:

[ZephyrPhantom]

Wording seems off, as it implies you're giving Twilit Pariah -2|-2 twice.

Did you mean "Twilit Pariah and target card both get -2/-2."?

[Marsu]

Ain't nobody got time for actually reading what one posts if one submits five cards a day.

[Drake_XIV]

Yes, I do mean to say 'target creature,' instead of 'this creature.'

I've only submitted three ideas in the past two weeks or so.

Also, it's hard to make sure the wording is written right when operating under minimal sleep.

[skyironsword]

So you mean 'target card'? Would you like me to supply you with a remake of this card with new wording?

[Drake_XIV]

Fixed

[kaempfer13]

Up: Its cost is equal to maxwells demon (not factoring in that it requires a duo) while the effect can not compete with it at all. Reduce both effect cost and summoning cost by 1 quanta and bump its defense up to 10/12 while keeping the offense the same so that antimatter/ reverse time and mutation can have synergy with this card.

[Drake_XIV]

Maxwell's is reliant on ATT > HP.  This is a restrictive CC that is not entirely reliant on health and, aside from buffs, cannot be countered, so creature healing is not relevant.  It also helps increase healing from AM.  I feel its potential uses are, for now, worth what it is positioned at.

[skyironsword]

Wait, it can go negative?

[Drake_XIV]

Yes.  I have not had a reason to restrict it from doing so yet.

[Brontos]

This would be my Light addition in my SoPbow. ^^

It's a nice, balanced and new card. I'd love to see the art because as it is right now, the card only lacks charism imo.

[skyironsword]

So it can kill and bring attack into negatives. Which shall I choose?