Gravitational Lens | Gravitational Lens

[ElementalDearWatson]

I've had a bit of a re-think of this.  dragonsdemesne's misinterpretation of this as something which negates all spells is more interesting than my actual idea was.  I also think that people are right about it being way too powerful as is.

Here's my thoughts - I'm going to make it a Permanent, rather than a Shield, getting rid of the damage reduction in the process.  Reduce the cost to 2 | 1, and give it a time limit of 1 round.

How does that sound to people?

[furballdn]

That sounds alright. Like a one turn cloak.

[ElementalDearWatson]

That sounds alright. Like a one turn cloak.

I was thinking more like sundial.

[TheManuz]

That sounds alright. Like a one turn cloak.

I was thinking more like sundial.

I like your new interpretation! Go go go!

[RRQJ]

you can destroy this with pulvy or butterfly effect right?  The notes section is a bit misleading.

This is probably better than the original.  I think you may get away with making it two turns.  After all, your spells are also useless.

[EvaRia]

Underpowered.
Compare with silence, then consider that silence is rarely played.

The only pro is that it isn't affected by sanctuary.

[TheManuz]

Yeah, maybe 2 turns is more appropriate, since it blocks only spells and not creatures and permanent, and it affects both sides.
The cost could be 1|0, like sundial, or 2|1, i'm not sure.