Brawl #2 - Round 2 [Voting Phase]

[TheManuz]

Artists! 
Team 
The photo is not very good quality and something could have been done with the background, but I like the set up. I wonder what the death mark was done with and if it will wash off. xD

The symbol was made with eyeliner and eyeshadow, it took only 5 minutes to clean it! A little more to draw it...

[Paddoo]

Artist Task Review
Team Crusaderps
A lot like Team Fire. Possibly the most entertaining concept in the entire round, and very comically done.. But the execution's not there. A little more play with light, a better DOF, composition and whitebalance - it'd have made this. I couldn't care less if the entire WIP was phone snapshots, but a little more love for that final picture would've gone such a long way. A shame, too - I was quite excited about this one!

Thanks, and I couldn't agree more, but sadly I had like 5 seconds to take the picture - and it has to be in my shower - so my whole flat wouldn't catch fire, so it kind of limited my possibilities...

And congratulations to all other artists, these photos are all impressive !

[ARTHANASIOS]

Would it be permissible for me to ask the FE and OTers one question?

Did you guys playtest your idea? A response would be greatly appreciated

P.S. Entropy was playtested several times over the course of the game development and seemed relatively balanced.

Yes, I personally made an imaginary playtest. However, DungeonQuest is an awesome board game yet imbalanced by its own nature; too luck dependant and with some instant killing cards/events (that's the reason there are alternative rules about heroe's death, sun counter etc.). However, making it into a board game required to double check and modify a lot of things. In general, only god knows how much work we've put into our FE-OT submission.

[Fippe94]

I can't help to notice that Team Fire's Deck Builder submission's description is a lot more than 100 words (over 200). I first did a good explanation of how my deck is meant to be used, but after majofa pointed out that it is 100 words max, I had to shorten it quite a bit. And then seeing another submission with a lot more words feels a bit frustrating. I also saw that most other deck submissions was around 96-99 words, so I'm probably not the only one that had to shorten my submission due to the rules.

Now, the rule change was in the middle of last round's thread, with no change in the opening post, so I suggest that for future rounds you'll have the limitation in the opening post, and then if you exceed the limit, either removed description or that the Brawl Masters just remove the end of it or something.

[glennfoo]

we have blesings from the oracle, so we even have nymph you guys jelly?

our forum expert and off topicker really took the time to do all of them. it took almost 1 week. as you can see, our submission consists of 4 parts. Please read them. they really put effort in it

I am not advertising the combo task, but when they show me the work, I cannot keep my gaping mouth shut. If I am not their boss, I would have + rep them. And I am doing it now
because, when I saw the effort they put in, I am very touched to be honest. regardless of the votes this round, I am proud of them. and of course my other teammates too

[Kakerlake]

I can't help to notice that Team Fire's Deck Builder submission's description is a lot more than 100 words (over 200). I first did a good explanation of how my deck is meant to be used, but after majofa pointed out that it is 100 words max, I had to shorten it quite a bit. And then seeing another submission with a lot more words feels a bit frustrating. I also saw that most other deck submissions was around 96-99 words, so I'm probably not the only one that had to shorten my submission due to the rules.

Now, the rule change was in the middle of last round's thread, with no change in the opening post, so I suggest that for future rounds you'll have the limitation in the opening post, and then if you exceed the limit, either removed description or that the Brawl Masters just remove the end of it or something.

There was a limitation to the wordcount there? I didn't even see such a ruling (just checked, it was written on saturday)
Since I was gone over the weekend, I had to send in my submission by friday and there wasn't anything written about that until way past that. Sory to hear you had to cut down your texting. I really think one should write as much as one likes to describe the deck. Most folks wont easily see what a deck does until they played it themselves a dozent times. IMO no one should expect the voters to test the decks in order to get an opinion.

changing rules in the middle of a round really sucks. I'd appreciate it if that wouldn't happen again. If one can write less or more words than intended, just leave it be. It's fair for everyone when they have the same limitations. But changing it in the middle might cause some folks to not get that information and make accidentally an illegal submission, even though they put loads of work into it. Allowing that submission causes frustration to those that followed those new rules, as we can see here.

[Calindu]

changing rules in the middle of a round really sucks. I'd appreciate it if that wouldn't happen again. If one can write less or more words than intended, just leave it be. It's fair for everyone when they have the same limitations. But changing it in the middle might cause some folks to not get that information and make accidentally an illegal submission, even though they put loads of work into it. Allowing that submission causes frustration to those that followed those new rules, as we can see here.

In case you haven't seen it: The limitation was 0 words before, then the brawlmaster got it to 100, but writing over 200 words when the limitation is 100 shouldn't be allowed.
Everyone probably had to cut their explanations(based on numbers of words used), it would be really lame to not do anything on that.
I'm waiting for a rulling on this.

[Kakerlake]

changing rules in the middle of a round really sucks. I'd appreciate it if that wouldn't happen again. If one can write less or more words than intended, just leave it be. It's fair for everyone when they have the same limitations. But changing it in the middle might cause some folks to not get that information and make accidentally an illegal submission, even though they put loads of work into it. Allowing that submission causes frustration to those that followed those new rules, as we can see here.

In case you haven't seen it: The limitation was 0 words before, then the brawlmaster got it to 100, but writing over 200 words when the limitation is 100 shouldn't be allowed.
Everyone probably had to cut their explanations(based on numbers of words used), it would be really lame to not do anything on that.
I'm waiting for a rulling on this.

Aye, that was written on saturday as well. In the opening post was nothing written about a text, so I (and apparently the other deckbuilders as well) assumed that we are free to write whatever we want.

I really wonder what ruling they're gona do here as well.

[Atom_heart]

Cloak is not that expensive IMO.

These Cloacks are, though.
Chap, take note

[Chapuz]

Apologies for the confusion and rule changing in the middle of the round. From next round there will be all clarified.

[Jocko]

Just check your task once more before submitting. Its not that hard.

[Onizuka]

I'm up from just voting for artist task and card designer last round to everything but writer.

Woo.