Atlantis's Protection | Atlantis's Protection

[Daguerreo]

It seems the first one would be more appropriate as a spell (although the name and picture would need to be changed for it to make sense).  As a permanent, If someone were to destroy it, what would happen?

Smart question..... uhm...

[artimies7]

The first one is pretty good, but I think that if you take out the 'bubble' part, you can add in a bit where 'When Flooded, protection is infinite.'

Because we don't really need to have the bubble part told to us; we can infer it ourselves, desu.

Infinite protection seems really OP, maybe could be increased by 1.

Are you sure don't we need? Half of players of elements use explosions...

Or this, then: 'When Flooded, drain    per turn to protect all permanents. If not, lasts one spell each.' That's pretty much all you need.

[EvaRia]

I like the first one better as well.

I don't think you need to make it too much more complicated though.

[Daguerreo]

Modified card into "protective bubble" version.

[Daguerreo]

Modified in spell, adjusted name and submitted to the cruicible.

Bump for more comments and opinions.

[Jenkar]

I like this card. Soft Permanent protection. Sadly, i think protecting ALL your permanents once is a bit too powerful.

[Daguerreo]

I like this card. Soft Permanent protection. Sadly, i think protecting ALL your permanents once is a bit too powerful.

That's why I've added a poll to ask which cost this card should have

[Calindu]

Looks like a cloak, just that it doesn't protect your creatures and it last until your opponent draws PC.

[Daguerreo]

Looks like a cloak, just that it doesn't protect your creatures and it last until your opponent draws PC.

Exactly. has few permanents, but when used often are key cards, stealing your ice shield can bring you to the lost. It give a soft protection, can be easy broke because your target usually aren't all the opponent's permanents, but only 1 or 2, and if you are a Pulverizer of a creature with destroy it delay one turn the destruction.

[Xenocidius]

CURATOR COMMENT

• The Name fields should contain the names shown on the card images.
• The Cost fields should contain the costs shown on the card images.
• The Type in the table is incorrect; the card is a spell.

[Daguerreo]

CURATOR COMMENT

• The Name fields should contain the names shown on the card images.
• The Cost fields should contain the costs shown on the card images.
• The Type in the table is incorrect; the card is a spell.

Done.

[rickerd]

I chose 5/4 because the cost are too high if you think about pulvi and poseidon

Edit:
wait does that bubble surround all permanents or is there a bubble for each permanent, in that case it should be maybe even higher than 7/5