Bio-Shift | Bio-Shift

[BluePriest]

NAME: Bio-Shift ELEMENT: Entropy COST: 2 TYPE: Spell ATK|HP: N/A ABILITY: All your creatures gain a passive skill.	NAME: Bio-Shift ELEMENT: Entropy COST: 1 TYPE: Spell ATK|HP: N/A ABILITY: All your creatures gain a passive skill.

ART: rmforall@comcast.net (http://www.everystockphoto.com/photo.php?imageId=414572) IDEA: BluePriest NOTES: This card doesnt remove previous passive skills. This card just adds skills, so using 6 of these could give a creature 6 different passive skills. Passive Skill List: Airborne, Voodoo, Mummy, Poisonous, Devour, Ranged, Swarm. Currently, game mechanics will only allow for 2 passive skills, but who says that wont ever change? SERIES: ***Insert series name and link to series page (if any)***

[guolin]

Could use a cost decrease. Some of the passive skills, like airborne, don't affect much anyways.

[BluePriest]

Im debating if it should also add a new active skill, replacing the current one. If it doesnt though, then yeah, it probably should have a cost decrease.

[plastiqe]

Just adding a passive skill doesn't seem worth using up a card spot in a deck, cause none of the passives are game changing.  Creature enchants in general are iffy cause you're investing two cards where one CC can erase both.  Even if this was free to play I don't think it'd be good enough.

Maybe you could rework it so ALL of your creatures gain a random passive..?

[BluePriest]

Just adding a passive skill doesn't seem worth using up a card spot in a deck, cause none of the passives are game changing.  Creature enchants in general are iffy cause you're investing two cards where one CC can erase both.  Even if this was free to play I don't think it'd be good enough.

Maybe you could rework it so ALL of your creatures gain a random passive..?

Agreed. Did this along with a cost decrease. Updated OP

[Kuroaitou]

An interesting card indeed... if you managed to get 'swarm' on one of your creatures that you play multiples of (Say, Firefly, Skeleton, or some creature), then it'd be hilarious.

Opponent: "All I have to do is play Rain of Fire next turn, and his creatures will be screwed over."

You: *plays this card - majority of your creatures gain Swarm*

Opponent: *sees HP boost on a number of your creatures* O_O


Devourer, poisonous, and airbourne/ranged would also be useful in case you're facing someone using Wings or Otyughs, but the question is, can these passive skills stack? (i.e. - since the card has no mention of adding -more- passives to a creature with or without passive skills...)

Oh, and I have idea if your card art is... legal?  ??? I've never heard of anyone just using the default background as card art...

[BluePriest]

An interesting card indeed... if you managed to get 'swarm' on one of your creatures that you play multiples of (Say, Firefly, Skeleton, or some creature), then it'd be hilarious.

Opponent: "All I have to do is play Rain of Fire next turn, and his creatures will be screwed over."

You: *plays this card - majority of your creatures gain Swarm*

Opponent: *sees HP boost on a number of your creatures* O_O


Devourer, poisonous, and airbourne/ranged would also be useful in case you're facing someone using Wings or Otyughs, but the question is, can these passive skills stack? (i.e. - since the card has no mention of adding -more- passives to a creature with or without passive skills...)

Oh, and I have idea if your card art is... legal?  ??? I've never heard of anyone just using the default background as card art...

Well, if it gave airborne to an already airborne creature, then it would just appear to have done nothing. However, if you gave poisonous to an airborne creature, then it would have airborne AND poisonous.  Does that answer your question?

And were you saying you have an art idea if mine doesnt work? I have a feeling it isnt acceptable art, so if you do have an idea, that would be great lol.

[ratcharmer]

How's this for art?

http://everystockphoto.s3.amazonaws.com/astronomy_astrodeep_murraymesh_414572_o.jpg

It's a free stock photo, and kind similar to what you have.

[BluePriest]

How's this for art?

http://everystockphoto.s3.amazonaws.com/astronomy_astrodeep_murraymesh_414572_o.jpg

It's a free stock photo, and kind similar to what you have.

What would be the author name? I cant go back from that image to find an artist to contribute it to.

[ratcharmer]

Oops

here's the parent link:
http://www.everystockphoto.com/photo.php?imageId=414572

[BluePriest]

Thanks. Updated OP. Apparently I cant make a poll since its been too long, so what do you think? is this card OP? UP? Crucible ready?

Found it! Added a poll

[Kuroaitou]

Thanks. Updated OP. Apparently I cant make a poll since its been too long, so what do you think? is this card OP? UP? Crucible ready?

Found it! Added a poll

I'd say Crucible ready - I don't know if this is a minor detail/flaw or whatever, but change the symbol next to the "Element" into 'Entropy' inside the table format. Don't change the mark next to the card cost though.