Glaviga | Glavigar

[Glaviga]

NAME: Glaviga ELEMENT: Gravity COST: 5 TYPE: Spell ABILITY: Target creature's maximum health or strength are lowered to equal the lesser value.	NAME: Glavigar ELEMENT: Gravity COST: 3 TYPE: Spell ABILITY: Target creature's maximum health or strength are lowered to equal the lesser value.

ART: http://www.sxc.hu/photo/1271962 IDEA: Glaviga NOTES: Health is not reduced below 0

[$$$man]

This plus Flying titans=ULTIMATE DESYNC

[Glaviga]

Using this on a flying titan would result in an 8/8 creature, which probably not what you're thinking of.

[$$$man]

Using this on a flying titan would result in an 8/8 creature, which probably not what you're thinking of.

I know but losing 1 hp a moment would take FOREVER. Like rustler who has been knoen to cause rampant desyncs.

[wizelsnarf]

Really like the idea. This would be ruin fire decks.

[Glaviga]

It's not entirely original, but it's like a more powerful version of the Equilibrium card

http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,5925.msg66990#msg66990

[Demagog]

It could work, although you should specify how the mechanic works. Is it instant? Do they lose a point for each attack? Obviously it is a status effect. Also, I don't think you can make it so that health can't be increased. The card would still be targetable, so you could still buff it. The health would just have to decrease at the end of the turn.

[Glaviga]

The way this works is that stats are lowered instantaneously, however the creature's max health would be lowered by this card. Playing "Holy Light" or the angel's ability will not affect it.

In example, you play this on the enemy's Armaggio, making it a 1/1 using the angel's ability on it would do nothing and it would remain a 1/1. However, Blessing would make a 4/4.

[Demagog]

Ok, then the card should say it changes the actual value of health or attack to the value of the other one. That way you don't have to say that confusing bit about restoring health.

[Glaviga]

Card fixed.

[asymmetry]

Nice! Is it gradual (turn by turn) or instant?

[guolin]

Nice! Is it gradual (turn by turn) or instant?

It's instant, according to Glaviga.