Burning Hands | Burning Hands

[BluePriest]

NAME: Burning Hands ELEMENT: Fire COST: 0 TYPE: Spell ATK|HP: ABILITY: Gain X . X is the amount of cards you choose to discard from your hand x3.	NAME: Burning Hands ELEMENT: Fire COST: 0 TYPE: Spell ATK|HP: ABILITY: Gain X . X is the amount of cards you choose to discard from your hand x4.

ART: Xoned IDEA: BluePriest NOTES: SERIES: Burn Baby Burn (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,8920.msg113232#msg113232)

[Snopel]

It's like cremation without playing a card and killing it to up bonewalls and scavengers. =D
I actuallty like it. Say, if I had 2 useless fractals in my hand, use this, and I get 6  ?
However, that requires sacrificing more than one card to get anywhere near enough that Cremation gives..
...for no  cost.
So maybe this is a bit UP. i love the idea though. Maybe up the multiplication or lower the cost to 0? Or do nothing because I'm a crappy critic anyway. =P

[BluePriest]

It's like cremation without playing a card and killing it to up bonewalls and scavengers. =D
I actuallty like it. Say, if I had 2 useless fractals in my hand, use this, and I get 6  ?
However, that requires sacrificing more than one card to get anywhere near enough that Cremation gives..
...for no  cost.
So maybe this is a bit UP. i love the idea though. Maybe up the multiplication or lower the cost to 0? Or do nothing because I'm a crappy critic anyway. =P

It probably does need to have the cost to play the card 0, Theres no point in this one costing something since the first card would only give you 1 quanta (costing 2 to play and then gain 3 for discarding). I think Im going to change that. And discarding a monster doesnt up scavenger since the monster was directly discarded and never played

[Snopel]

It's like cremation without playing a card and killing it to up bonewalls and scavengers. =D
I actuallty like it. Say, if I had 2 useless fractals in my hand, use this, and I get 6  ?
However, that requires sacrificing more than one card to get anywhere near enough that Cremation gives..
...for no  cost.
So maybe this is a bit UP. i love the idea though. Maybe up the multiplication or lower the cost to 0? Or do nothing because I'm a crappy critic anyway. =P

It probably does need to have the cost to play the card 0, Theres no point in this one costing something since the first card would only give you 1 quanta (costing 2 to play and then gain 3 for discarding). I think Im going to change that. And discarding a monster doesnt up scavenger since the monster was directly discarded and never played

@Point 1: That's exactly right. =P You could get less than what you payed for.
@Point 2: I meant it's good to "immolate" without killing a creature. =D

[BluePriest]

Ahh, ok, you were saying that way your OPPONENT isnt helped, nvm.

[Snopel]

Ahh, ok, you were saying that way your OPPONENT isnt helped, nvm.

Yeah that's it. =)

[Snopel]

http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,8847.new.html#new
I made a different card off your idea. If that's ok with you. =P

[BluePriest]

http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,8847.new.html#new
I made a different card off your idea. If that's ok with you. =P

its a free country/

[Snopel]

http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,8847.new.html#new
I made a different card off your idea. If that's ok with you. =P

its a free country/

True. I was just checking.