1
Patch Notes and Development News / Re: What does Elements look without turns - Halloween treat
« on: November 05, 2011, 01:04:32 pm »DO NOT DELETE
DO NOT DELETE
DO NOT DELETE
EVARR!!!!
DO NOT DELETE
DO NOT DELETE
EVARR!!!!
Guest Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by a guest. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2
Aether / Re: Shard of Conscience
« on: October 13, 2011, 04:57:00 am »
For my ON TOPIC opinion?
I really think this shard will do good. It suits the
elements surprisingly well and will be a great addition to the game. It's a nice way to kick off the new Quanta-Cap function.
The only real problem I have with this is that the synergy with is just not there. It doesn't exactly do anything until you use three of these. Perhaps a silence effect for that turn too would be awesome. But that would mean it should be a spell instead of a permenant.
Maybe increase your quanta-cap by 5 (or 10 if upgraded)? That would be rather useful.
I really think this shard will do good. It suits the
elements surprisingly well and will be a great addition to the game. It's a nice way to kick off the new Quanta-Cap function.The only real problem I have with this is that the synergy with
is just not there. It doesn't exactly do anything until you use three of these. Perhaps a silence effect for that turn too would be awesome. But that would mean it should be a spell instead of a permenant.Maybe increase your
quanta-cap by 5 (or 10 if upgraded)? That would be rather useful.
3
Aether / Re: Shard of Conscience
« on: October 10, 2011, 07:54:04 am »
Making use of the new 75-quanta-cap system huh?
So does that mean... (ROUNDED UP - ROUNDED DOWN)
1 SoC = 37.5 (38 or 37) Quanta Cap
2 SoC = 19 or 18.5 (19 or 18) Quanta Cap
3 SoC = 9.5 (10 because that's the limit) or 9 (10 because that's the limit) Quanta Cap
From these statistics I think it sounds pretty fair enough. But farout. After No.3, your opponent is pretty much screwed unless they have heaps of pillars and some low-cost cards...
Oh and sorry if this has been posted already. =|
So does that mean... (ROUNDED UP - ROUNDED DOWN)
1 SoC = 37.5 (38 or 37) Quanta Cap
2 SoC = 19 or 18.5 (19 or 18) Quanta Cap
3 SoC = 9.5 (10 because that's the limit) or 9 (10 because that's the limit) Quanta Cap
From these statistics I think it sounds pretty fair enough. But farout. After No.3, your opponent is pretty much screwed unless they have heaps of pillars and some low-cost cards...
Oh and sorry if this has been posted already. =|
4
World of Elements / Re: WoE - Questions and Answers
« on: October 09, 2011, 05:57:21 am »
Just a quick question. Is it possible to sign off of this event? Because I'm on the event currently and recently I've been hit by a wave so if I continued any further all I'd be doing is using up a spot and not doing anything. I simply have no time.
5
Patch Notes and Development News / Re: Elements 1.29
« on: October 07, 2011, 07:59:48 am »
Well. I guess this ends the Firestall FG Farming deck.
Probably for the better.
Probably for the better.
6
Patch Notes and Development News / Re: Elements 1.29
« on: October 01, 2011, 09:49:00 am »
Why is Immolation nerfed? It's fine as it is. o_0
7
Patch Notes and Development News / Re: Elements 1.29
« on: September 20, 2011, 09:43:26 am »I think it should give "First Turn Activation(FTA)" instead of adrenaline regardless of paired Element.This.
Or if it has already been a turn before SoR is activated, it can use the ability again in the same turn.
8
Off-Topic Discussions / Re: Some of the people that play this game make me sick.
« on: September 20, 2011, 08:14:33 am »
Someone talking to PuppyChow like that? I doubt they've truly playing for years if they don't know who that is. 
9
World of Elements / Re: WoE - Questions and Answers
« on: September 20, 2011, 08:08:29 am »
Is there ever going to be a chatroom dedicated to WoE?
10
Patch Notes and Development News / Re: Elements 1.29
« on: September 20, 2011, 08:03:20 am »Also...anyone else miss SoD's old image? Here's to hoping Zanz reuses that art for another Shard.Right here. We have yellow, green, and a white shiny one for a shard that no one uses.
I liked blue. It looked... original. =D
11
Patch Notes and Development News / Re: Elements 1.29
« on: September 20, 2011, 07:01:20 am »
I agree with Xenocidius. After all, it IS Shard of Sacrifice. It makes so much sense.
12
Patch Notes and Development News / Re: Elements 1.29
« on: September 20, 2011, 06:15:57 am »
Looks a little bland, but still quite neat. 
Looks awesome!! =)
Looks... quite good, actually! AND VAMPIRE STILETTO HAS THREE BANDS!
LOOKS ABSOLUTELY SPECTACULAR!! I LOVE IT!!
Is umm... I don't know. It's really bland and doesn't represent earth too much like the others, buuutt hey! it looks different to Time now so I'll give it a pass =)Oh and the bands look FREAKING SPECTACULAR!! I would love to have that for the actual game!
You never fail to disappoint, Zanz. Well done once again!
EDIT: Bands have been fixed. Nevermind.