Flamethrower | Flamethrower

[Yondi444]

NAME: Flamethrower ELEMENT: Fire COST: 5 TYPE: Permanent (Weapon) ATK|HP: ABILITY: Weapon: Deals 3 Damage.   Burn: Opposing creatures suffer -2|-1 for 2 turns.	NAME: Flamethrower ELEMENT: Fire COST: 5 TYPE: Permanent (Weapon) ATK|HP: ABILITY: Weapon: Deals 3 Damage.   Burn: Opposing creatures suffer -2|-1 for 2 turns.

ART: innermagicclub http://i193.photobucket.com/albums/z10/innermagicclub/FireBreath.jpg http://s193.photobucket.com/albums/z10/innermagicclub/?action=view&current=FireBreath.jpg IDEA: Yondi444/bsurma NOTES: - Burned is a Status Effect SERIES:

[Fewk]

Lol i thought it only affects 1 creature when i voted... as it affects all of your opponents creatures, I would say that it shouldn't stack as this would provide you with a much too easy way of shutting most decks down.

I like the idea of it being a weapon which can sort of act as a shield

[Kael Hate]

Technology is elemental and magical in the world of elements, your image doesn't suit.

Could try this image.

http://i193.photobucket.com/albums/z10/innermagicclub/FireBreath.jpg
http://s193.photobucket.com/albums/z10/innermagicclub/?action=view&current=FireBreath.jpg

The text needs to be smarter.
How about?

"Weapon: Deals 3 Damage.
  Burn: opposing creatures suffer -2|-1 for 2 turns"

Burned Status can be a Flame Bauble that goes half size the turn it is to wear off.

[Yondi444]

I fixed card art and description. Really good idea Kael Hate. That was what i expected from card curator . Thanks for review btw.

[Kael Hate]

I fixed card art and description. Really good idea Kael Hate. That was what i expected from card curator . Thanks for review btw.

No problem.

[Kuroaitou]

Okay, a few things:

First off - nice image update. The art reminds me of a Fire Elemental being just spewing flames from his mouth onto your creatures, which must hurt like hell.

With the card itself, DON'T make it stack - considering that -2 | -1 is a 'status' effect, having it 'stack' would mean that you're either a) killing it (making it like a special version of Sniper from Eagle's Eye, and b) would cause low attack creatures to obtain -attack values (which would make it work like a form of antimatter, which doesn't make sense).

Actually, would this card drop a creature with 0 or 1 Attack to -2 or -1 attack, thus healing you if they attacked? Or not? Either way, the card is a nice idea, but I think Flamethrower feels a little bit odd to place in the Elements Game as a weapon. I keep on thinking of the artillery weapon, which doesn't quite fit still...

[Kael Hate]

Actually, would this card drop a creature with 0 or 1 Attack to -2 or -1 attack, thus healing you if they attacked? Or not? Either way, the card is a nice idea, but I think Flamethrower feels a little bit odd to place in the Elements Game as a weapon. I keep on thinking of the artillery weapon, which doesn't quite fit still...

Maybe a name change? Fire Breathing? I have no objections to the name as it is, as long as the imagery matches Elements theme.

[Yondi444]

Attack value when lowered by Burn can't go under 0, and ability don't stack. After few thoughts it would be clearly stupid .
EDIT:
Maybe something like Fire Breather would fit into this image and elements??