Chronologic Revival | Chronologic Resurrection

[Flayne]

NAME: Chronologic Revival ELEMENT: Time COST: 9 TYPE: Permanent ATK|HP: ABILITY: Every 2 turns, while this card is in play; the formerly destroyed creature is revived and placed on your side. If no creature is destroyed for 4 turns, this card is destroyed.	NAME: Chronologic Resurrection ELEMENT: Time COST: 9 TYPE: Permanent ATK|HP: ABILITY: Every 3 turns, while this card is in play; 2 formerly destroyed creatures are revived and placed on your side. If no creature is destroyed for 6 turns, this card is destroyed.

ART: Flayne IDEA: Flayne NOTES: for the opposites attract competition. (competition finished) -formerly destroyed creature: the last creature that was destroyed in the match. -lets say 3 turns have past and still no destroyed creature, if a creature gets destroyed, the countdown starts again. the opposite : http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,8188.msg100994#msg100994 SERIES: ***Insert series name and link to series page (if any)***

[ZephyrPhantom]

Wait.... so ANY destroyed creature will get revived and put on your field while this card is active?

[Flayne]

Wait.... so ANY destroyed creature will get revived and put on your field while this card is active?

no, any PREVIOUSLY destroyed creature/s would be revived

[ZephyrPhantom]

Even if it was the opponent's? Hmmm, this is a toughie.  It obviously is stronger late game though, as well as chancier.

[Flayne]

Even if it was the opponent's? Hmmm, this is a toughie.  It obviously is stronger late game though, as well as chancier.

i agree it is a tough one, i was going to change one tiny thing but i cbb since the card image was already there 

[Kuroaitou]

CURATOR COMMENT
-Replace the icon in the ELEMENT section with the word, 'Time'.  means Time quanta, and not the element Time; the two are not interchangeable
-Capitalize the word, 'Permanent' in the TYPE section of the table
-Leave the ATK|HP section of the table blank if the card is not a creature (Do not use the phrase 'N/A' to fill in spots of the table)
-*Shorten the TEXT if you can:

Example:
"Every 2 turns, the most recent
killed creature is placed on your
side. Chronologic Revival (Ressurection) is
lost if no creature dies within 4 turns."

* = optional

That said, the cost is a very heavy deterrent for someone to really play this card (most PC cards can ruin this instantly). The idea of continuous resurrection is nice, but also forces a Time user to splash into another element (like Fire) in order to reap the full benefits of getting the opponent's creatures. I would reduce the cost by at least 2-3 quanta for both versions, as they seem very risky to place in the current game (unless you know your opponent isn't going to play permanent control cards, but still...).

Lovely art though. How long did it take you to make that picture?

[AnonymousRevival]

Nice card art. Perhaps the clock could be "dissolved", symbolizing that is everywhere. (after all is the fourth dimension.)

[Flayne]

CURATOR COMMENT
-Replace the icon in the ELEMENT section with the word, 'Time'.  means Time quanta, and not the element Time; the two are not interchangeable
-Capitalize the word, 'Permanent' in the TYPE section of the table
-Leave the ATK|HP section of the table blank if the card is not a creature (Do not use the phrase 'N/A' to fill in spots of the table)
-*Shorten the TEXT if you can:

Example:
"Every 2 turns, the most recent
killed creature is placed on your
side. Chronologic Revival (Ressurection) is
lost if no creature dies within 4 turns."

* = optional

That said, the cost is a very heavy deterrent for someone to really play this card (most PC cards can ruin this instantly). The idea of continuous resurrection is nice, but also forces a Time user to splash into another element (like Fire) in order to reap the full benefits of getting the opponent's creatures. I would reduce the cost by at least 2-3 quanta for both versions, as they seem very risky to place in the current game (unless you know your opponent isn't going to play permanent control cards, but still...).

Lovely art though. How long did it take you to make that picture?

i mostly agree with you, but the reason i did that was to actually make it harder to use since it´s such a powerful card, also if someone wanted to use this card as a great part of a strategy, they´d just use Enchant/protect artifact which is very potent with this card, also which would make the card even more Powerful since the opponent will always be hesitant to use creature control tactics for the rest of the match 
and thanks , i made the art in Pixlr, it took me about 45-60 minutes, the brushes that come with pixlr are really handy to make just about anything
*fixed

[grindpower]

A nice, balanced card.

The quanta cost makes up for it's strong effect.