I poked Elbirn yesterday, and today he replied back that he was working on it.
Just here so Elbirn isn't flooded with "Y U NO UPDATE" messages.
Thankies xD
So yes, OP has been updated. As always, if I've missed anything or goofed in anyway, please verbally assault me so that I might remedy said errors. ^_^
Also, a few questions!
1. I've typically only been adding submitted stats that are sample sizes of at least 50 games. As in, even if a deck has already been submitted with 50 games played, if a second tester plays a handful of games (less than 50), I haven't been adding the second testers stats. Why? Because small sample size and incompleteness and blablabla. I figured that adding every person who plays a half dozen games and concludes "This deck suxxorz", would only skew stats in an inaccurate and negative manner.
How do you ladies and gents feel about this? Should I add every game played, or continue doing it the way I am?
2. A few posts back, it was mentioned that some "quality control" would be desirable, in particular, only adding decks with above average stats. How do all of you feel about this?
I have a "post reserved" underneath of the OP. Originally, I had been considering making the first post upgraded decks and the second post unupgraded decks. Would you all prefer this, or do you think the OP should be, say, the top 5 or 10 decks for each league, and then the second post is every other deck submitted? Basically, first post = "Hall of Fame, use these decks dey da bestest, etc," second post = "Here are other options that didn't quite cut it, use at your own risk, but are options nonetheless"